[April 23] Q4OS ver 2.7-r5 - 1080P Pinebook / Pinebook |[Feb 26] Recalbox beta v3.1- Rock64 |[Feb 26] Recalbox 190222- RockPro64 / Minimal Debian by mrfixit2001 - 190222 - RockPro64 |[Feb 26] Q4OS 2.7-r2 - Pinebook 1080P / Pinebook |[Feb 22] Batocera Linux 5.20-20190121- RockPro64 | [Feb 19] Manjaro KDE 19.02 / Manjaro LXQT 19.02 - Pinebook1080P / Pinebook | [Feb 19] Slackware Aarch64 Miniroot and XFCE 20190201 - RockPro

Project Inspiration | Get Started | IRC Logs | Forum Rules/Policy


Building a clustered NAS with RockPro64
#1
Hi,

I am debating doing the above with MooseFS or LizardFS.  The idea is that I would cluster multiple SBCs and my initial thought was to build it based on oDroid HC2s.  However, I think that P64Pro could be an option too given its SATA support.  (I suppose Rock64 too with the USB-SATA adapter, but I would be nervous about that.)  I am an avid Pine user with both original Pine64s and Rock64s in use in my house.  They work fine although there have been stability issues in the past.

All of the above brings me to my question.  When it comes to my NAS, stability really matters since it will contain all my critical files.  I will have backups and so there is protection, but I want a solution that I can be confident in.  At this point, I am not sure if R64Pro is there as I think that there could still be some stability questions and then concerns when upgrading as well.

Do you folks agree with my concerns or have we reached the point where it is solid?

Thank you in advance.
Reply
#2
Quick update: I spoke with @ayufan about this on IRC. He indicated that the RPro64 is stable and usable as a NAS. I am still debating the end solution as it comes down to the use case and in this case it is trade off between the following two options:

1. RPro64 - Two boards with two HDs each which would be about the same cost but would result in more compute per board
2. oDroid-HC2 - four boards with one HD each - less expensive (although electrical costs could be a bit higher), but it would result in higher availability and lower compute per board

The HC2 is a clearly a more mature platform which could be a bad thing, but in this case, feels like it is more proven. I am likely going to go with that although I have not made the final decision. I am leaning towards the HC2 due to maturity and the added availability of multiple boards.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Rockpro64 boot issues larsgn 7 282 Yesterday, 11:15 AM
Last Post: Bullet64
  RockPro64 not booting jekohk 5 124 Yesterday, 12:06 AM
Last Post: Bullet64
  RockPro64 - no WiFi/BT at this time? donblanco 1 38 04-22-2019, 05:02 PM
Last Post: evilbunny
Sad RockPro64 with OpenMediaVault - Ethernet card is not recognized eduapof 8 262 04-18-2019, 08:28 AM
Last Post: g_t_j
  Anybody built a RockPro64 Cluster ? axelf 9 1,160 04-10-2019, 02:04 PM
Last Post: axelf
  the 24/48 rockpro64 cluster LMM 2 174 04-05-2019, 07:35 AM
Last Post: LMM
  RockPro64 power consumption seiji 11 2,751 03-30-2019, 11:15 PM
Last Post: pfeerick
  Rockpro64 CPU fan mikeD 28 5,043 03-28-2019, 04:18 AM
Last Post: hunderteins
  ROCKPro64 2GB availability smp 1 173 03-25-2019, 10:50 PM
Last Post: tllim
  How is the RockPRO64 with android? nJoy. 0 134 03-11-2019, 05:02 AM
Last Post: nJoy.

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)