>wow, 900MB/s
I did say the high speeds sometimes are bogus,,quote,,too high to be believable
I haven't found the switch to fix,, have you?
You will notice that the evo plus speeds seem OK
But this is irrelevant, you are testing to find the BAD or otherwise
The bottom line is: if it is not a fake,, it is hard to beat any evo,
most are worse, sometimes a lot worse
What we need is 3D Xpoint in a uSD
Quote:I haven't found the switch to fix,, have you?
-I (capital i)? if this isn't supported, then there is no way to fix. but I remember using this test on armbian and it worked.
ANT - my hobby OS for x86 and ARM.
(01-16-2020, 12:23 PM)z4v4l Wrote: Quote:I haven't found the switch to fix,, have you?
-I (capital i)? if this isn't supported, then there is no way to fix. but I remember using this test on armbian and it worked.
Yup it is. See my results below. IIRC the iozone version is relevant, way back working with Thomas Kaiser we worked out some discrepancies were version related.
All tests on my RockPro64.
My 512G Adata SX8200Pro NVMe (not as fast as my Samsung SM981 but a whole lot bigger)
Code: $ iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024 -i 0 -i 1 -i 2
Iozone: Performance Test of File I/O
Version $Revision: 3.429 $
Compiled for 64 bit mode.
...
random random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread
102400 4 3037 6459 90502 95308 33475 6152
102400 16 13447 25481 162888 185929 79805 24745
102400 512 259171 293960 365909 367490 354627 289705
102400 1024 313224 397174 440851 438564 461775 352619
iozone test complete.
The 16G Foresee eMMC, noted for being among the slower Pine64 eMMC options
Code: random random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread
102400 4 3107 4210 8153 8144 8085 3817
102400 16 16235 17555 30487 31479 31486 17033
102400 512 74256 79150 106646 108230 107462 75865
102400 1024 80364 79805 115184 114837 114471 79968
iozone test complete.
My 128G Samsung Evo+
Code: random random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread
102400 4 2938 3306 9769 9745 6929 662
102400 16 10194 16498 25067 25611 24014 15326
102400 512 31305 33920 56710 56802 56026 36588
102400 1024 21218 21756 58652 58492 58591 22143
iozone test complete.
And a 32G class 10 micro SD, one of my better no-names! Yup - today (newly formatted & empty) it beat the Evo+ in 4k random writes, mainly as the Evo+ is nearly full so the test file was placed at the end of the disk. On a good day my Evo+ are closer to eMMC performance.
Code: random random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread
102400 4 1747 1883 5885 6012 4622 905
102400 16 6921 6628 18878 18789 15132 3420
102400 512 22059 25496 58523 58641 57695 19440
102400 1024 28415 23058 59517 59920 59362 24839
iozone test complete.
- ROCKPro64 v2.1 2GB, 16Gb eMMC for rootfs, SX8200Pro 512GB NVMe for /home, HDMI video & sound, Bluetooth keyboard & mouse. Arch (6.12 kernel, Openbox desktop) for general purpose daily PC.
- PinePhone Pro Explorer Edition, daily driver, rk2aw & U-boot on SPI, Arch/SXMO on eMMC
- PinePhone BraveHeart now v1.2b 3/32Gb, Tow-boot with pmOS/SXMO on eMMC
01-19-2020, 11:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-19-2020, 03:44 PM by Der Geist der Maschine.
Edit Reason: a1/a2; newegg
)
(01-16-2020, 04:44 AM)dukla2000 Wrote: The mass-market use of SD-card for linux root started with Raspberry Pi nearly 8 years ago. One of the guys who has done a lot of work to understand their performance is Jeff Geerling. I have put a link to him in the Resources section of the PinePhone software page as well.
TL;DR - Samung Evo+ (and my 64G is faster than my 32G is faster than my 128G IIRC at 4k writes!)
Getting the Evo+ is almost impossible. It's superseded by the (weaker) Evo Plus. On Amazon, you see quite often pics of the Evo+ but Evo Plus in the description or the other way around. My local store does not sell it.
The situation on newegg was even worse. Pic and description were Evo+, but a reviewer said that was not what he got.
Now A1 and A2 cards are becoming more popular ... but they seem to suck on Linux https://github.com/ThomasKaiser/Knowledg...D_cards.md
The more I know about micro SD cards, the less I know which to buy
01-23-2020, 05:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2020, 05:06 AM by Surehand53.)
I use the Sandisk Extreme 32Gb A1 (gold) and am very happy with it.
It is very noticeable faster than my other Sandisk Ultra 32Gb (silver).
Someone mentioned A1 being the sweet spot right now as A2 although more capable is not widely supported by hardware, can’t find the link right now, though.
I use the Sandisk Extreme 32Gb A1 and am very happy with it.
It is very noticeable faster than my other Sandisk Ultra 32Gb.
Someone mentioned A1 being the sweet spot right now as A2 although more capable is not widely supported by hardware, can’t find the link right now, though.
(01-23-2020, 05:03 AM)Surehand53 Wrote: Someone mentioned A1 being the sweet spot right now as A2 although more capable is not widely supported by hardware, can’t find the link right now, though
Jeff Geerling is less polite, he calls the A2 spec marketing bs.
- ROCKPro64 v2.1 2GB, 16Gb eMMC for rootfs, SX8200Pro 512GB NVMe for /home, HDMI video & sound, Bluetooth keyboard & mouse. Arch (6.12 kernel, Openbox desktop) for general purpose daily PC.
- PinePhone Pro Explorer Edition, daily driver, rk2aw & U-boot on SPI, Arch/SXMO on eMMC
- PinePhone BraveHeart now v1.2b 3/32Gb, Tow-boot with pmOS/SXMO on eMMC
A2 is bs if not using an A2 setup, ya. the samsung evo plus 64GB (and larger) microsd cards are U3. that's what i buy. I get ~60MBps read on this versus ~150MBps for eMMC.
|