04-30-2016, 02:55 AM

Ok so i tested both cards and here are the results:

Kingston 16GB class 10 UHS1

Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 72.947 MB/s

Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 10.459 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 6.633 MB/s [ 1619.4 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 0.421 MB/s [ 102.8 IOPS]

Sequential Read (T= 1) : 71.308 MB/s

Sequential Write (T= 1) : 10.066 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 6.341 MB/s [ 1548.1 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 0.406 MB/s [ 99.1 IOPS]

Transcend 8gb Class 4

Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 22.491 MB/s

Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 6.475 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 5.560 MB/s [ 1357.4 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1.876 MB/s [ 458.0 IOPS]

Sequential Read (T= 1) : 23.072 MB/s

Sequential Write (T= 1) : 5.871 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 5.493 MB/s [ 1341.1 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 1.882 MB/s [ 459.5 IOPS]

Both used Test : 50 MiB [D: 0.0% (0.0/4815.0 MiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec] via crystaldiskmark x64

So looking at it the transcend only beats the kingston in speed at the random writing parts, but i find the speed in the pine64 from those 2 cards really different as the transcend loads things up faster and doest hang as much. Is the random write speed really that differentiating?

Kingston 16GB class 10 UHS1

Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 72.947 MB/s

Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 10.459 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 6.633 MB/s [ 1619.4 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 0.421 MB/s [ 102.8 IOPS]

Sequential Read (T= 1) : 71.308 MB/s

Sequential Write (T= 1) : 10.066 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 6.341 MB/s [ 1548.1 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 0.406 MB/s [ 99.1 IOPS]

Transcend 8gb Class 4

Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 22.491 MB/s

Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 6.475 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 5.560 MB/s [ 1357.4 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1.876 MB/s [ 458.0 IOPS]

Sequential Read (T= 1) : 23.072 MB/s

Sequential Write (T= 1) : 5.871 MB/s

Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 5.493 MB/s [ 1341.1 IOPS]

Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 1.882 MB/s [ 459.5 IOPS]

Both used Test : 50 MiB [D: 0.0% (0.0/4815.0 MiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec] via crystaldiskmark x64

So looking at it the transcend only beats the kingston in speed at the random writing parts, but i find the speed in the pine64 from those 2 cards really different as the transcend loads things up faster and doest hang as much. Is the random write speed really that differentiating?