(02-01-2023, 05:17 AM)zetabeta Wrote: what i know inner workings of most linux distros, i don't think stripping down goes very far for battery life, maybe gpsd. usually if program is installed but does not run, it does not consume resources. although, exceptions occur. better approach is to use micro-kernel or half-rtos or similar with limited background services.The main reason for short battery life is again the hardware: A 40nm(!) cpu designed 2015 which was never meant to be used in a smartphone. A few more percent battery time of the current PinePhones (Non-Pro) may be possible with further software optimizations I guess, but not 50% or even more. I think that's physically impossible. A bigger/better battery of course would be possible without changing the whole PinePhone platform (and software compatibility)... I don't really understand why Pine64 made a more powerful phone (the Pro), but did not adress the battery life problem (AFAIK).
Because I may sound very negative here: I LOVED my phone for many months, even with it's flaws (like rather short battery life), but the constant freezes and crashes I suffer since January are a no-go. Everything else I could accept!
Using encrypted Mobian (bookworm) on pmOS CE Convergence PinePhone (3GB/32GB) as Daily Driver, and Beta Edition Convergence PinePhone (3GB/32GB) with encrypted Mobian (bookworm) as Backup device.
