Tuning Rock64 - I need advices
#1
Hi guys,

I misunderstood the real capacity of this board, I was convinced it was slightly below the Odroid-XU4 but I was wrong, so now I would like to try pushing this board to its limits. I meant to use it with Lakka, so I am focusing on best performance available.

Right now the only thing I thought (but I haven't done yet) is check out the governor, I was thinking to set up it to "ondemand" or "performance" (mostly the latter). I would like also to enable the full GPU clock. General safe overclock it would be great but I haven't found any relevant info, it would be great if it is possible enable a safe overclock like the PI boards family. My cpu and gpu have a passive heat cooling.

Thanks in advance,

D.
#2
No one willing to help me? :'(
#3
It is possible to run the board at a higher clock. But last time I saw it done was back in the day when pre-production boards were in the dev evaluation period. The reason is simple, for the slight improvement in performance you have to handle much higher thermals. In short, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. I remember fire219 running the board with a big heatsink and a fan to get the board stable at (IRRC) 1.5Ghz ... It just doesn't make much sense.
You can find me on IRC, Discord and Twitter


#4
(02-10-2018, 01:59 AM)Luke Wrote: It is possible to run the board at a higher clock. But last time I saw it done was back in the day when pre-production boards were in the dev evaluation period. The reason is simple, for the slight improvement in performance you have to handle much higher thermals. In short, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. I remember fire219 running the board with a big heatsink and a fan to get the board stable at (IRRC) 1.5Ghz ... It just doesn't make much sense.

Got it, by the way the governor is already set up on performance, isn't there anything more I can do to improve the performance?
#5
(02-11-2018, 12:57 AM)Danielsan Wrote:
(02-10-2018, 01:59 AM)Luke Wrote: It is possible to run the board at a higher clock. But last time I saw it done was back in the day when pre-production boards were in the dev evaluation period. The reason is simple, for the slight improvement in performance you have to handle much higher thermals. In short, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. I remember fire219 running the board with a big heatsink and a fan to get the board stable at (IRRC) 1.5Ghz ... It just doesn't make much sense.

Got it, by the way the governor is already set up on performance, isn't there anything more I can do to improve the performance?

At this point any major improvements will be achieved by improving drivers, etc.
You can find me on IRC, Discord and Twitter


#6
so how overclock can be done?


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question Hardware issues with Rock64 grobbs 11 1,910 07-24-2021, 10:23 AM
Last Post: robinkyle11
  Trustzone support for Rock64 capablegh 1 154 07-17-2021, 10:15 AM
Last Post: capablegh
  Python GPIO Library for the Rock64 (R64.GPIO) Leapo 37 39,680 07-02-2021, 03:20 PM
Last Post: klausfelix
  rock64, compile problems "illegal instruction", "memory fault" -> ddr_333Mhz? klausfelix 0 145 07-02-2021, 03:13 PM
Last Post: klausfelix
Information Serial Console for the Rock64 MarkHaysHarris777 33 31,484 06-24-2021, 12:24 PM
Last Post: mikeklien
  lost eletronic component rock64 marvin1986 1 385 06-01-2021, 06:27 PM
Last Post: 8bit
Shocked Rock64 - Reboots after few minutes addezai 2 541 04-22-2021, 07:03 PM
Last Post: addezai
  Rock64 Long Term stability ramprasad 4 2,072 03-16-2021, 07:23 PM
Last Post: Rocklobster
  Rock64 No Audio - Solved wbecks 11 15,774 03-15-2021, 03:15 PM
Last Post: lowry
  Safest way to send shutdown signal to headless Rock64 SMB server? bmurphr1 3 1,295 03-14-2021, 06:01 PM
Last Post: clach04

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)