05-14-2016, 03:52 AM
(05-12-2016, 06:18 AM)rahlquist Wrote:(05-12-2016, 03:41 AM)tkaiser Wrote:I've never had data valuable enough to bother with either ZFS or ECC just good backcups. Lets face it probably the majority that want to use pine for a NAS are looking for it to serve their movies they downloaded(05-11-2016, 12:40 PM)rahlquist Wrote: Making the argument that say I needed a small samba based NAS, say 4tb and say we use the same drive and headless config between an X86 and SBC, the savings, is likely going to be maybe $50-75 after you build comparably reliable systems.
To be honest: For valuable data you want to use filesystems that can ensure data integrity (btrfs or ZFS) and then you need also ECC RAM.
Someone gets me.
I was beginning to think i was the exception...