08-21-2017, 11:44 PM
(08-21-2017, 11:29 PM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote:Minimal gets confusing as I think they used to call the images minimal but now called network installer.(08-21-2017, 10:35 PM)stuartiannaylor Wrote: OK no probs not very minimal is it
minimal is subjective entirely; I had to beg ayufan to put htop in the build ! ( he did humor me, thanks ayufan )
If all you mean is a bootable kernel with nothing else, well no its got a bit more than that; most linux fans "think" minimal is a minimal gnu+linux system. ( read that carefully )
A minimal system by definition is a system which is ( gnu ) + linux ; the kernel plus the gnu minimal system components.
In many SBC embedded systems this means an optimized linux kernel plus "busybox" or equiv.
Its very difficult to build up from the repos if every time you turn around you must add a generally adopted minimal tool ( or tool chain ) in order to continue building.
IMHO, the xenial-minimal system is a perfect balance; if it were up to me it would have a bit more; and that's where my scripts come in; I build it up to my "minimum" with some simple bash scripting that takes care of getting it done right with minimal mistakes and omissions too !
You have to start someplace.
I get the server download and bang on ssh and thats it then the rest is built up.