12-13-2022, 04:54 PM
I am attempting to run Armbian on a Pine64 Quartz64. I haven't read through all of everyone's forum posts, and this might have been addressed...
I found: https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=16312 which links to https://users.armbian.com/balbes150/quartz64/ from there, there are a number of relatively recent disk images for Quartz64 model A boards. I am able to get just about any of them functioning; e.g. burned to emmc or sd, and the board is able to boot. The two issues that I have noticed are:
+ The board is an 8GB mem board, but for some of the images, it appears to the system to only have 2GB
+ General performance for any of the images is abysmal
From balbes150's images: using, Armbian_22.11.0-trunk_Quartz64a_sid_current_5.19.17.img.xz, GeekBench produces...
--> https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19280197
Even forcing the board to run at max Mhz (1800), the performance is still the same.
Has anyone else seen similar performance issues and incorrect memory being reported?
Thanks in advance for the help...
I found: https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=16312 which links to https://users.armbian.com/balbes150/quartz64/ from there, there are a number of relatively recent disk images for Quartz64 model A boards. I am able to get just about any of them functioning; e.g. burned to emmc or sd, and the board is able to boot. The two issues that I have noticed are:
+ The board is an 8GB mem board, but for some of the images, it appears to the system to only have 2GB
+ General performance for any of the images is abysmal
From balbes150's images: using, Armbian_22.11.0-trunk_Quartz64a_sid_current_5.19.17.img.xz, GeekBench produces...
--> https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19280197
Even forcing the board to run at max Mhz (1800), the performance is still the same.
Has anyone else seen similar performance issues and incorrect memory being reported?
Thanks in advance for the help...