07-25-2018, 01:27 PM
(07-25-2018, 12:47 PM)dukla2000 Wrote:(07-25-2018, 05:17 AM)Bullet64 Wrote: Look -> https://gist.github.com/ayufan/30c46381c...4a752946dbI did see on his lspci output it was reported as
He is using an Samsung PM961
"Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM961/PM961", but pfeerick 960 EVO output is identical.
My limited insight to Samsung 960 NVMe devices indicates SM961 and PM961 devices were released to OEMs early in 2016. And Samsung later released EVO and PRO versions for the general public. However, as per Anandtech there are differences in the NAND chips which is what I expect explains the difference in iozone numbers from ayufan and pfeerick?
If the table at Anandtech is accurate then actual PM961 devices should be the slowest of the lot.
I remember, that Ayufan postet that he has an 960 Pro. But that is only from my memory, I can be wrong too. Waiting for Ayufan...
Sorry for any mistakes. English is not my native language
1. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
2. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
3. RockPro64 v2.1
https://linux-nerds.org/
1. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
2. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
3. RockPro64 v2.1
https://linux-nerds.org/