01-23-2016, 02:04 PM
(01-23-2016, 12:58 PM)tllim Wrote: We did not see the reason of release PCB source file is necessary. In general, schematic and PCB image file already enough for board modification which I have been practiced for more than 30 years.
One main reason is we don't mind DIY modify the board for their project needs but we don't plan to support the modified board such as optimized DRAM path for overclocking.
Pine64 is NOT an open source hardware project (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_op...e_projects).
Hi TL Lim,
again, thanks for the quick response.
If you don't see a reason for open sourcing the hardware, why do you advertise open hardware? I backed your Kickstarter campaign thinking I was supporting an open hardware project, as it's stated on your homepage! I feel a little duped now to be honest.
Can you elaborate, why you decided not to make the Pine64 an open hardware platform?
You mentioned, that you don't want to support people who want to overclock the board. But you wouldn't have to do that at all. If you would publish the boards source files, people could do what they wanted, but there's not obligation for you to further support them.
On the other hand, I think being a real open source project would gain you a significant bonus from the whole DIY/Make community. You rely on open source software to make the board work anyway, so why don't just commit to it?
Or do you fear that someone can manufacture and sell your Pine for less? I strongly doubt that that's realistic.
Cheers,
enoCeniP