07-24-2019, 08:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-24-2019, 08:57 AM by stuartiannaylor.)
Ps talking about consumption and haven't took much notice but I have a hunch that the proposed batt is likely slightly on the small size.
They would prob be better like the above chromebook and offer it as an option. Chromebook was 38Wh!!!
That way rather than find out the hardway and have to order a latter extra its a little cheaper as the 10,000 mAH is removed from cost.
Just can not see 10,000 mAH doing the pinebookpro any justice and maybe shouting that now before sales is a good idea?
The RK3399 has no parallel to the pinebook Allwinner A64 its a superb Arm application CPU with quite a meaty CPU & GPU that meets what is entry level computing and until recently good enough for Google Chromebooks.
In use it is going to pull more power and also some may want to OC to OP1 of 2.0/1.5 as its silicon lottery but it will be a few who are unlucky that can not run stable at that.
10Wh me thinks is going to be quite limited for what is far more powerful than the original pinebook.
They would prob be better like the above chromebook and offer it as an option. Chromebook was 38Wh!!!
That way rather than find out the hardway and have to order a latter extra its a little cheaper as the 10,000 mAH is removed from cost.
Just can not see 10,000 mAH doing the pinebookpro any justice and maybe shouting that now before sales is a good idea?
The RK3399 has no parallel to the pinebook Allwinner A64 its a superb Arm application CPU with quite a meaty CPU & GPU that meets what is entry level computing and until recently good enough for Google Chromebooks.
In use it is going to pull more power and also some may want to OC to OP1 of 2.0/1.5 as its silicon lottery but it will be a few who are unlucky that can not run stable at that.
10Wh me thinks is going to be quite limited for what is far more powerful than the original pinebook.
