10-18-2018, 08:43 AM
Greetings!
I am curious about something: as I know so far, RockPro64 should be more powerful than Odroid-XU4.
The overall experience makes it seems so (installing, browsing, response time, etc)
Checked hardinfo's benchmark, and it confirmed it.
Cryptohash benchmark says RockPro64 is 226.12 and Odroid-XU4 is 198.49 - another evidence.
However, I tried it by mining a cryptocoin aswell, and I have troubling results. With Odroid, I was capable to do it with 32khash, but with RockPro64 it was only 27khash.
Can someone explain why RockPro64's hashrate is lower than Odroid-XU4's?
Is it something to do with the kernel (which one is the most recent?)? Or is it because the clock rate or the number of threads? (Though I have to add that this mining program is armhf, but I managed to make it work by adding the armhf architecture)
I am curious about something: as I know so far, RockPro64 should be more powerful than Odroid-XU4.
The overall experience makes it seems so (installing, browsing, response time, etc)
Checked hardinfo's benchmark, and it confirmed it.
Cryptohash benchmark says RockPro64 is 226.12 and Odroid-XU4 is 198.49 - another evidence.
However, I tried it by mining a cryptocoin aswell, and I have troubling results. With Odroid, I was capable to do it with 32khash, but with RockPro64 it was only 27khash.
Can someone explain why RockPro64's hashrate is lower than Odroid-XU4's?
Is it something to do with the kernel (which one is the most recent?)? Or is it because the clock rate or the number of threads? (Though I have to add that this mining program is armhf, but I managed to make it work by adding the armhf architecture)
