07-12-2019, 04:38 AM
RK3399 is 2xA72 + 4xA53. Can I use all six cores simultaneously or is it either 2xA72 or 4xA53 at a time? E.g. can I encode with ffmpeg utilizing all six cores?
RK3399 question
|
07-12-2019, 04:38 AM
RK3399 is 2xA72 + 4xA53. Can I use all six cores simultaneously or is it either 2xA72 or 4xA53 at a time? E.g. can I encode with ffmpeg utilizing all six cores?
07-12-2019, 10:54 AM
every core is on its own, you can use them all simultaneously; given the software in question knows what's multithreading.
ANT - my hobby OS for x86 and ARM.
Here is a quote from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_big.LITTLE
Quote:ARM big.LITTLE is a heterogeneous computing architecture developed by ARM Holdings, coupling relatively battery-saving and slower processor cores (LITTLE) with relatively more powerful and power-hungry ones (big). Typically, only one "side" or the other will be active at once, but all the cores have access to the same memory regions, so workloads can be swapped between Big and Little cores on the fly. Are you 100% sure about rk3399 or was it some general considerations or yours?
notice that "typically". basically, those who wrote that felt it's the "right" way of using them. but given all cpus are independent, they may be used independently. i don't have rockpro, but i am sure, linux uses them exactly like i said - independently. or at least it can be configured to use them like that. also you can assign a thread to run only on big or little cores. there is no any prevention in the hardware to use all 6 cores, trust me.
ANT - my hobby OS for x86 and ARM.
07-17-2019, 03:31 AM
His (z4v4l) insistence is right.
When referring to the following log, you'd be able to understand that his insistence is right. $ ffmpeg -i bbb-1920x1080-cfg06.mkv bbb-1920x1080-cfg06.mp4 Code: top - 15:30:09 up 6:50, 2 users, load average: 9.14, 6.72, 3.19 * Cpu0<->Cpu3: Cortex-A53, Cpu4<->Cpu5: Cortex-A72
07-17-2019, 05:58 AM
Thanks guys! So rockpro is still superior to 4xA72 in raspi4.
07-20-2019, 05:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2019, 05:00 AM by stuartiannaylor.)
(07-17-2019, 05:58 AM)enip Wrote: Thanks guys! So rockpro is still superior to 4xA72 in raspi4. Rockpro64 is approx 20-30% faster due to higher clock speed even if dual core 2xA72 in an octocore package with 4xa53 Its the GPU of the Pi4 VC4 that really lags by approx 200% in OpenGL which is absolutely huge. |
Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Another Fan Question | backwoodstech2 | 1 | 863 |
02-03-2024, 04:09 PM Last Post: backwoodstech2 |
|
Question regarding odd startup behaviour | Mff | 0 | 1,432 |
12-03-2022, 03:18 PM Last Post: Mff |
|
Considering buying and question on the PCIe slot | MobileJAD | 25 | 47,650 |
11-07-2019, 03:10 PM Last Post: hmuller |
|
Basic question on the Nas case of the rockPro | Slam | 1 | 3,601 |
01-23-2019, 08:04 AM Last Post: Slam |
|
Rk3399 isp documentation | ktc | 3 | 5,368 |
11-20-2018, 12:11 AM Last Post: tllim |
|
Performance issue/question | bobdaroze | 8 | 12,792 |
11-11-2018, 10:41 PM Last Post: tuxd3v |
|
Rock64 OMV video question / same for RockPro64 I would assume | RockPro64Newbie | 0 | 16,779 |
08-19-2018, 04:11 AM Last Post: RockPro64Newbie |
|
Dual SATA-II Interface Card question and NAS question | RockPro64Newbie | 5 | 6,743 |
08-17-2018, 10:58 PM Last Post: RockPro64Newbie |
|
Power Supply ordering question | frewind | 8 | 11,500 |
08-03-2018, 11:15 AM Last Post: dkryder |