FYI
tkaiser writes here (in 2016 though)
https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?...32#pid6232
Pine64 is limited to ~22/23 MB/s sequential speed anyway (as most other Allwinner SBC) and the most important performance factor is random I/O. So take care that you choose cards that show high random I/O performance especially with small record sizes that are from one of the few manufacturers that build their retail products from both their own NAND chips and own controllers: http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic...rformance/
He's one of the leading forces on Armbian , and knows his SOC.
This indicates to me, that a Sandisk Ultra vs Sandisk Extreme would prob have same performance in the PP.
Just make sure you get an original card, the extra performance of the Extreme would prob not be utilized on the PP.
Edit:
The PP uses an Alwinner SOC , not a Pine64 SOC
But i'd still expect a Sandisk Ultra to be able to fully utilize the SoC
/Bingo
tkaiser writes here (in 2016 though)
https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?...32#pid6232
Pine64 is limited to ~22/23 MB/s sequential speed anyway (as most other Allwinner SBC) and the most important performance factor is random I/O. So take care that you choose cards that show high random I/O performance especially with small record sizes that are from one of the few manufacturers that build their retail products from both their own NAND chips and own controllers: http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic...rformance/
He's one of the leading forces on Armbian , and knows his SOC.
This indicates to me, that a Sandisk Ultra vs Sandisk Extreme would prob have same performance in the PP.
Just make sure you get an original card, the extra performance of the Extreme would prob not be utilized on the PP.
Edit:
The PP uses an Alwinner SOC , not a Pine64 SOC
But i'd still expect a Sandisk Ultra to be able to fully utilize the SoC
/Bingo