10-08-2020, 03:35 PM
After reading again all the posts, I would like to comment 3 points:
- people using PP as a daily driver are very brave, but not realistic If you are missing phone calls, missing messages, etc. You are going to be missing meetings, calls from the doctor, from the kids' school, etc You can put a brick in your pocket and say is your daily driver, but is not. The phone has to be able to get phone calls and txt and being able to call and text without major issues.
- From some posts, I understand that hardware/firmware should go first, then OS would go faster. Is that true? Because if this is true, donations from PP and people should go to the priority. Let's get the firmware working then let's worry about the OS.
-I have the impression that if important issues as point 2 are ignored, the PP project will die as a realistic project. It might survive as a toy for tinkers, developers, etc but will never become a real phone. May be is what is it. An exploratory platform to prove a linux phone is possible (but not PP). Is PP about this?
- people using PP as a daily driver are very brave, but not realistic If you are missing phone calls, missing messages, etc. You are going to be missing meetings, calls from the doctor, from the kids' school, etc You can put a brick in your pocket and say is your daily driver, but is not. The phone has to be able to get phone calls and txt and being able to call and text without major issues.
- From some posts, I understand that hardware/firmware should go first, then OS would go faster. Is that true? Because if this is true, donations from PP and people should go to the priority. Let's get the firmware working then let's worry about the OS.
-I have the impression that if important issues as point 2 are ignored, the PP project will die as a realistic project. It might survive as a toy for tinkers, developers, etc but will never become a real phone. May be is what is it. An exploratory platform to prove a linux phone is possible (but not PP). Is PP about this?
