(03-05-2019, 10:47 AM)wood Wrote:(03-04-2019, 08:54 AM)Luke Wrote: Bottom line is that phones are not easy. The more complex a phone the more things you need to accommodate and plan for. For a first, security oriented, Linux (and *BSD!) phone from PINE64 its quite important to keep it a relatively simple device, which delivers in the few key aspects you'd want/ expect it to.
I don't really see any evidence that security is a primary design goal for the pinephone. There is the potential for a secure device, and that is great, but the kind of rigid lock-down required for provable security would severely limit the ability of end users to adapt the phone to their needs. I think adaptability is just as important.
If security were a primary design goal, the privacy switches would not be located "under the back cover". I'm not criticizing that choice, by the way. I would be satisfied to be able to simply disable the services that use the cellular/wifi/bluetooth, even if choose to do it at the kernel level (modprobe -r).
What I meant by "first" was - PINE64's first phone...