07-25-2018, 12:47 PM
(07-25-2018, 05:17 AM)Bullet64 Wrote: Look -> https://gist.github.com/ayufan/30c46381c...4a752946dbI did see on his lspci output it was reported as
He is using an Samsung PM961
"Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM961/PM961", but pfeerick 960 EVO output is identical.
My limited insight to Samsung 960 NVMe devices indicates SM961 and PM961 devices were released to OEMs early in 2016. And Samsung later released EVO and PRO versions for the general public. However, as per Anandtech there are differences in the NAND chips which is what I expect explains the difference in iozone numbers from ayufan and pfeerick?
If the table at Anandtech is accurate then actual PM961 devices should be the slowest of the lot.
- PinePhone BraveHeart now v1.2b 3/32Gb daily driver, Tow-boot with pmOS/SXMO on eMMC
- PinePhone pmOS Community Edition 2/16Gb driving my picture frame, Tow-boot with pmOS/SXMO on eMMC
- PinePhone Pro Explorer Edition, Tow-boot on SPI, Arch/SXMO on eMMC
- ROCKPro64 v2.1 2GB, 16Gb eMMC retired in favour of a fruity upgrade