09-29-2020, 01:39 PM
I presume that would work. But something went wrong somewhere. `dd` is as down-to-Earth as it gets. All it does is blindly copy from one place to the other, block by block. So long as you feed it good parameters and the data stream is correct, it really can't go wrong.
bs=64k should be faster from what I've seen, but shouldn't affect the data success.
What will slow you down is doing the unxz in advance. But I would do that just to simplify it further.
bs=64k should be faster from what I've seen, but shouldn't affect the data success.
What will slow you down is doing the unxz in advance. But I would do that just to simplify it further.
