Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet?
#9
Bit of an update, as I had some progress building the last piece of the puzzle that I couldn't install from AUR by modifying the PKGBUILD: anbox-git.

To overcome the issues in my previous, I simply altered the Makefile to suppress treating warnings as errors. It netted some success (build stops at 90% now and not 37%,) where now the hold up of building this on aarch64 is testing. I'm currently trying to track down where I can disable or correct the tests. My efforts so far admittedly a bit hacky, but I want to try and do what I can in a "best practice" manner.

Here's the current progress:

Code:
$ make
[  7%] Built target process-cpp
[ 10%] Built target emugen
[ 12%] Built target OpenglCodecCommon
[ 15%] Built target GLESv2_dec
[ 17%] Built target renderControl_dec
[ 19%] Built target GLESv1_dec
[ 24%] Built target emugl_common
[ 26%] Built target OpenGLESDispatch
[ 27%] Built target xdg
[ 29%] Built target xdg_test
[ 30%] Built target backward
[ 31%] Built target backward_object
[ 36%] Built target cpu_features
[ 37%] Built target list_cpu_features
[ 40%] Built target anbox-protobuf
[ 89%] Built target anbox-core
[ 90%] Built target anbox
[ 90%] Linking CXX executable intent_tests
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/9.2.0/../../../../lib/Scrt1.o: in function `_start':
init.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
/usr/bin/ld: init.c:(.text+0x1c): undefined reference to `main'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `testing::internal::scoped_ptr<std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::reset(std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*)':
/usr/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h:1215: undefined reference to `testing::internal::IsTrue(bool)'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `testing::internal::scoped_ptr<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::reset(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*)':
/usr/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h:1215: undefined reference to `testing::internal::IsTrue(bool)'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `Intent_IsValid_Test::TestBody()':
/run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:26: undefined reference to `testing::internal::GetBoolAssertionFailureMessage[abi:cxx11](testing::AssertionResult const&, char const*, char const*, char const*)'
/usr/bin/ld: /run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:26: undefined reference to `testing::internal::AssertHelper::AssertHelper(testing::TestPartResult::Type, char const*, int, char const*)'
/usr/bin/ld: /run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:26: undefined reference to `testing::Message::Message()'
/usr/bin/ld: /run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:26: undefined reference to `testing::internal::AssertHelper::operator=(testing::Message const&) const'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `testing::internal::scoped_ptr<std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::reset(std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*)':
/usr/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h:1215: undefined reference to `testing::internal::IsTrue(bool)'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `Intent_IsValid_Test::TestBody()':
/run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:26: undefined reference to `testing::internal::AssertHelper::~AssertHelper()'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `testing::internal::scoped_ptr<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::reset(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*)':
/usr/include/gtest/internal/gtest-port.h:1215: undefined reference to `testing::internal::IsTrue(bool)'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `Intent_IsValid_Test::TestBody()':
/run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:24: undefined reference to `testing::internal::GetBoolAssertionFailureMessage[abi:cxx11](testing::AssertionResult const&, char const*, char const*, char const*)'
/usr/bin/ld: /run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:24: undefined reference to `testing::internal::AssertHelper::AssertHelper(testing::TestPartResult::Type, char const*, int, char const*)'
/usr/bin/ld: /run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:24: undefined reference to `testing::Message::Message()'
/usr/bin/ld: /run/media/topherneal/SPACE/anbox/tests/anbox/android/intent_tests.cpp:24: undefined reference to `testing::internal::AssertHelper::operator=(testing::Message const&) const'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/intent_tests.dir/intent_tests.cpp.o: in function `testing::internal::scoped_ptr<std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::reset(std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*)':


If anything stands out to anyone going through it, let me know! Between work and going through these line-by-line, with a more novice skill set than many, my eyes start feeling burnt out and missing plenty.

Once I figure out how to get past the GTest issues, I'll post another update. Hopefully, it will be with a repo with the changes made so others can try it for themselves.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 12-16-2019, 02:53 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 12-22-2019, 03:26 AM
Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 12-24-2019, 08:14 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by gleachkr - 12-26-2019, 11:41 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 12-26-2019, 12:48 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by gleachkr - 12-26-2019, 04:49 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 12-27-2019, 02:28 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-10-2020, 08:27 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-15-2020, 09:49 AM
Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-17-2020, 09:06 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-17-2020, 11:25 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-18-2020, 07:34 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-18-2020, 08:32 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by FrankWu - 03-02-2020, 09:40 AM
Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-18-2020, 10:34 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-18-2020, 07:52 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-18-2020, 08:22 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-20-2020, 08:06 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-20-2020, 08:26 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-20-2020, 08:39 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-20-2020, 08:45 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-20-2020, 08:50 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-20-2020, 08:55 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-20-2020, 12:11 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-20-2020, 02:09 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-20-2020, 07:09 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-20-2020, 08:49 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-21-2020, 02:57 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-21-2020, 10:59 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-25-2020, 08:07 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-29-2020, 08:18 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 01-30-2020, 05:17 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by FrankWu - 02-27-2020, 09:34 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 01-31-2020, 06:46 PM
Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 02-02-2020, 08:38 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 02-05-2020, 04:24 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 02-05-2020, 07:41 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 02-05-2020, 08:02 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 03-18-2020, 09:47 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by FrankWu - 03-25-2020, 03:38 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 03-25-2020, 12:00 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by PakoSt - 03-31-2020, 03:15 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 04-01-2020, 06:05 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by poVoq - 05-17-2020, 08:17 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 05-19-2020, 06:17 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 07-21-2020, 06:57 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 08-30-2020, 02:42 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 08-31-2020, 06:01 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 08-31-2020, 11:05 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 08-31-2020, 11:47 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 08-31-2020, 01:55 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 08-31-2020, 02:12 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 09-02-2020, 05:32 AM
Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-02-2020, 05:50 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 09-02-2020, 11:46 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-02-2020, 12:04 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 09-02-2020, 12:58 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-02-2020, 02:45 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-08-2020, 06:46 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-08-2020, 06:54 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-08-2020, 06:58 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-09-2020, 08:03 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 09-10-2020, 09:39 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tophneal - 09-10-2020, 09:47 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Idaho - 09-24-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by poVoq - 09-29-2020, 07:19 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by jiyong - 02-23-2021, 06:59 AM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by tllim - 03-01-2021, 01:35 PM
RE: Anyone tried Anbox-4-arm64 yet? - by Proant - 08-11-2021, 11:21 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Compile of Anbox fails because kernel function kallsyms_lookup_name() is unexported Tsvi Bar-David 6 7,793 06-30-2020, 06:41 AM
Last Post: tophneal

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)