10-06-2016, 08:07 AM
(10-05-2016, 07:28 AM)ssvb Wrote: I'm not a lawyer myself. But there are two license related problems here:
<snip>
... but just adding the missing license notice back should resolve everything.
No, its not quite that simple. Um, the $10,000 question is "why?" was the license stuff removed ?
Could it be that some of the proprietary code used GPL licensed material ?
This problem is 'way' more complicated that anyone is talking about. If it were easy Simon would have packaged this weeks ago ! If it were easy the documentation would have been forth-coming weeks ago. The truth is that this situation does not have an easy fix; please excuse my bluntness, but things don't get any easier with a bunch of lawyer wannablies spreading rumors about how easy this legal ( and technical ) issue is. That just gets the whole rumor mill started up again making the community at large believe a vast number of false-hoods. its just not helpful.
marcushh777
please join us for a chat @ irc.pine64.xyz:6667 or ssl irc.pine64.xyz:6697
( I regret that I am not able to respond to personal messages; let's meet on irc! )

please join us for a chat @ irc.pine64.xyz:6667 or ssl irc.pine64.xyz:6697
( I regret that I am not able to respond to personal messages; let's meet on irc! )