12-11-2018, 02:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-11-2018, 02:52 PM by BackWoodsTech.)
(12-11-2018, 01:23 PM)dukla2000 Wrote:(12-10-2018, 07:17 PM)BackWoodsTech Wrote: Just to cover my bases: i tested both USB 2.0 ports and still the same behavior.
Using the USB 3.0 port however and the device worked as expected.
Does this offer any insight?
How about the RockPro64 properly implements USB2.0 and limits the power to 500mA. Whereas USB3.0 allows more (I am no expert, 1 quick answer from Prof Duck indicates 900mA). And your router needs >500mA @ 5V?
that's an interesting thought. IIRC when I ran the device via a Kill A Watt meter it was only using like 2 Watts (~0.5Amps).
I'd sure hate to have to occupy the sole USB 3.0 port on this just because of a problem with the USB 2.0
One thing I am wondering is if there's a default setting for the USB 2.0 that's trying to mount the device rather than charge it? I guess that makes no sense.
FWIW this is on OMV 4.x (Debian Stretch).
UPDATE: the device does say 5v 2A.