06-24-2016, 08:48 AM
(06-24-2016, 02:49 AM)ssvb Wrote:yeah, intel. they are still doing industrial type atom like designs. much better. but cost more also. which is why allwinner popular. cheap.(06-23-2016, 11:42 PM)dkryder Wrote: my biggest problem with the pine64 is allwinner. i just do not see much of a future with this company in the open source area,
Allwinner provides both the hardware manuals and their somewhat wacky kernel source code. Then the open source hobbyists are adding proper support to the mainline Linux kernel, fixing Allwinner bugs in the process. This model works and is sustainable. And there are surely much worse hardware vendors around.
Of course some people are impatient and want the mainline kernel support here and now. This is perfectly understandable. I think that they probably should buy some other hardware (and pay a premium price for it).
Quote:so i think if pine64 is to grow as a company they will have to go in another direction.
The grass is always greener on the other side. Do you have a suggestion of a better SoC?