01-14-2016, 08:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2016, 08:32 PM by AnonSequitur.)
What is the probability that Pine 64 will satisfy Google's Brillo IoT hardware compatibility?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Brillo
Google is developing Brillo as the IoT OS and ecosystem to do home automation, smart cities, and everything IoT.
At the moment, Google has approved the Brillo compatibility of Intel Edison or Qualcomm Dragonboard 410c development board.
https://developers.google.com/brillo/?hl=en
Android based Brillo arives-with-hacker-sbc-support
http://linuxgizmos.com/android-based-bri...c-support/
"Brillo can be configured to run within resources as small as 128MB of flash and 32MB of RAM"
Brillo supports "ARM, Intel, and MIPS hacker SBCs."
It would appear that Pine 64 should be compatible with Brillo, but I'm not sure if there is any other considerations I'm missing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Brillo
Google is developing Brillo as the IoT OS and ecosystem to do home automation, smart cities, and everything IoT.
At the moment, Google has approved the Brillo compatibility of Intel Edison or Qualcomm Dragonboard 410c development board.
https://developers.google.com/brillo/?hl=en
Android based Brillo arives-with-hacker-sbc-support
http://linuxgizmos.com/android-based-bri...c-support/
"Brillo can be configured to run within resources as small as 128MB of flash and 32MB of RAM"
Brillo supports "ARM, Intel, and MIPS hacker SBCs."
It would appear that Pine 64 should be compatible with Brillo, but I'm not sure if there is any other considerations I'm missing.
