+- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org)
+-- Forum: ROCKPRO64 (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=98)
+--- Forum: General Discussion on ROCKPRO64 (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+--- Thread: Some performance comparisions (/showthread.php?tid=6158)
Some performance comparisions - pfeerick - 06-09-2018
So, since I've got both the pine64, rock64 and rockpro64 on the bench atm, and am playing with some timelapse video conversion... I thought I'd run a job on all three and see what the results were.
Unsurprisingly, the rockpro64 won the race. I was surprised to see the pine64 wasn't that far behind the rock64, but then again, I'm not doing anything that I think would really take advantage of the hardware encoding...
Now this wasn't that hard a job, stitching together some 1800 stills into a around 90 second timelapse, but it still illustrates the performance difference between the boards at this stage, with what is likely to be sub-optimal encoding settings.
And because evilbunny made me pull out my pineH64 and run linux on it... it gets a mention also, but it is a dishonorable mention as the Linux image I have for it is barely enough to boot it, and it is seriously un-optimised ...
Code:
real 2m48.377s
user 10m49.964s
sys 0m1.980s
pfeerick@pineh64:~$RE: Some performance comparisions - frewind - 06-10-2018
(06-09-2018, 03:31 AM)pfeerick Wrote: So, since I've got both the pine64, rock64 and rockpro64 on the bench atm, and am playing with some timelapse video conversion... I thought I'd run a job on all three and see what the results were.
Unsurprisingly, the rockpro64 won the race. I was surprised to see the pine64 wasn't that far behind the rock64, but then again, I'm not doing anything that I think would really take advantage of the hardware encoding...
Now this wasn't that hard a job, stitching together some 1800 stills into a around 90 second timelapse, but it still illustrates the performance difference between the boards at this stage, with what is likely to be sub-optimal encoding settings.
And because evilbunny made me pull out my pineH64 and run linux on it... it gets a mention also, but it is a dishonorable mention as the Linux image I have for it is barely enough to boot it, and it is seriously un-optimised ...
Code:real 2m48.377s
user 10m49.964s
sys 0m1.980s
pfeerick@pineh64:~$
It looks like a significant uplift in performance, can't wait to get my hands on one.....
RE: Some performance comparisions - rontant - 06-15-2018
It would great if we can see some test results of Samba performance on conventional disk as well as on SSD.
RE: Some performance comparisions - pfeerick - 06-16-2018
(06-15-2018, 08:27 PM)rontant Wrote: It would great if we can see some test results of Samba performance on conventional disk as well as on SSD.
I'll do that once I have a SSD to connect to it... it's still in the mail.
