PINE64
Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - Printable Version

+- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org)
+-- Forum: ROCK64 (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=85)
+--- Forum: Linux on Rock64 (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=88)
+--- Thread: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images (/showthread.php?tid=5398)

Pages: 1 2 3


Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - Rar9 - 01-02-2018

How to update from 0.65 to new
0.66 image

rock64@rock64:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
rock64@rock64:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
rock64@rock64:~$ sudo apt-get install linux-rock64
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
linux-rock64 is already the newest version (0.6.5).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.


RE: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - dkryder - 01-02-2018

there is an update file along with the image files on ayufans git


RE: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - Rar9 - 01-03-2018

(01-02-2018, 09:46 AM)dkryder Wrote: there is an update file along with the image files on ayufans git

Great but what is this called as there are many under https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/linux-build/releases

& what command do I use to update.


RE: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - dkryder - 01-03-2018

6.6.6 is removed
you can try 6.6.7 or 6.6.8


RE: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - Rar9 - 01-05-2018

When Dist-update from bionic-minimal-rock64-0.6.9-160-arm64.img.xz to 0.6.10  get this error.

Quote:Setting up linux-rock64-package (0.6.10) ...
e2label: Filesystem has unsupported read-only feature(s) while trying to open /dev/mmcblk1p7
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
dpkg: error processing package linux-rock64-package (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-rock64:
 linux-rock64 depends on linux-rock64-package (= 0.6.10); however:
  Package linux-rock64-package is not configured yet.

dpkg: error processing package linux-rock64 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Processing triggers for flash-kernel (3.75ev3dev5) ...
Using DTB: rk3328-rock64.dtb
Installing /usr/lib/linux-image-4.4.103-rockchip-ayufan-162/rockchip/rk3328-rock64.dtb into /boot/dtbs/4.4.103-rockchip-ayufan-162/rk3328-rock64.dtb
Taking backup of rk3328-rock64.dtb.
Installing new rk3328-rock64.dtb.
flash-kernel: installing version 4.4.103-rockchip-ayufan-162
Taking backup of Image.
Installing new Image.
Taking backup of initrd.img.
Installing new initrd.img.
Taking backup of dtb.
Installing new dtb.
Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-rock64-package
 linux-rock64
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Whats Wrong?
And can this be fixed?


RE: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - dkryder - 01-05-2018

just as an aside, ayufan has said a couple times in the forum that he would prefer opening issues on the github repo since it helps him track issues. another thing i do not think you fully understand yet is these pre-releases are basically untested, non-perfect, first release very alpha type builds. so to show up with what seems like demands for info, instead of reporting the issue in the proper place as more of a fyi to the developer, rather than questions about what the errors are and when or if a fix is coming, might place you as a better community member willing to test, report and help. usually stuff gets fixed when it can and will be ready when it is. if you can not accept that you would be better off just using the latest release rather than these bleeding edge builds.


RE: Rock64 0.6.x ayufan images - thewonderer - 01-29-2018

Question regarding update 0.6.16. How will the change' Limit USB3 to HS mode in u-boot' affect USB performance? Why was this changed? Question for ayufan I guess... Thanks.