<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[PINE64 - Chromium OS on Pinebook Pro]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.pine64.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[PINE64 - https://forum.pine64.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 07:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Which OS can I actually run a 1080p pinebook non-pro?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=15021</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 11:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=23482">Scott104</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=15021</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="color: #878a8c;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">Hi, </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #878a8c;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">I have tried a bunch of different images with various kernels, but in all cases performance is unusable. I'd like to use this device for <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">[i]something</span></span>[/i], but it needs to be reasonably good at it. I had issues with: some images black screening because they were intended for the low-res screen, some images not working when transferring them to emmc, GUI performance in general sucking, hardware support being incomplete and even non-GUI applications being slow. Kali worked, but it was just too slow to do anything. I'm not even expecting web browsing, at least a usable desktop. Is this even possible?</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">What are you running and what is the least sucky option that at least works?</span></span></span><br />
<br />
</span></span><span style="font-size: 1pt;" class="mycode_size"><img src="https://www.redditstatic.com/desktop2x/img/renderTimingPixel.png" loading="lazy"  alt="[Image: renderTimingPixel.png]" class="mycode_img" /></span></span></span></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="color: #878a8c;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">Hi, </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #878a8c;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: IBMPlexSans, Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font"><span style="font-size: medium;" class="mycode_size"><span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">I have tried a bunch of different images with various kernels, but in all cases performance is unusable. I'd like to use this device for <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">[i]something</span></span>[/i], but it needs to be reasonably good at it. I had issues with: some images black screening because they were intended for the low-res screen, some images not working when transferring them to emmc, GUI performance in general sucking, hardware support being incomplete and even non-GUI applications being slow. Kali worked, but it was just too slow to do anything. I'm not even expecting web browsing, at least a usable desktop. Is this even possible?</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #1a1a1b;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-family: 'Noto Sans', Arial, sans-serif;" class="mycode_font">What are you running and what is the least sucky option that at least works?</span></span></span><br />
<br />
</span></span><span style="font-size: 1pt;" class="mycode_size"><img src="https://www.redditstatic.com/desktop2x/img/renderTimingPixel.png" loading="lazy"  alt="[Image: renderTimingPixel.png]" class="mycode_img" /></span></span></span></span>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FydeOS privacy policy?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=14721</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=15626">TDC_PBP</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=14721</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[FydeOS sounds really cool (and probably would be a great backup OS if something I need to use doesn't work in Linux on the PBP yet), but I would really like to read FydeOS' privacy policy to know what data it is collecting on me before trying it. I looked on their English website, but I couldn't find a privacy policy anywhere. Could someone please share a link to it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[FydeOS sounds really cool (and probably would be a great backup OS if something I need to use doesn't work in Linux on the PBP yet), but I would really like to read FydeOS' privacy policy to know what data it is collecting on me before trying it. I looked on their English website, but I couldn't find a privacy policy anywhere. Could someone please share a link to it?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Black screen on both FydeOS as Chromium from github]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=13638</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=21963">QuinTeknoLife</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=13638</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey,<br />
<br />
<br />
I've been trying to get Chromium OS to start from sd, but both FydeOS as Chromium R77 are giving me a black screen and a (single) chime sound on boot...<br />
<br />
<br />
Edit: I have resolved the issue. If anyone else is running into these not booting issues, install mrfixits' u-boot (using an SD-card with any working linux, flip the eMMC/SD switch to SD, press the power button and after 2 seconds flip the switch back to eMMC and you should be booting off the SD-card while still being able to write to the eMMC)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey,<br />
<br />
<br />
I've been trying to get Chromium OS to start from sd, but both FydeOS as Chromium R77 are giving me a black screen and a (single) chime sound on boot...<br />
<br />
<br />
Edit: I have resolved the issue. If anyone else is running into these not booting issues, install mrfixits' u-boot (using an SD-card with any working linux, flip the eMMC/SD switch to SD, press the power button and after 2 seconds flip the switch back to eMMC and you should be booting off the SD-card while still being able to write to the eMMC)]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ubuntu Web Remix]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=12232</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=16863">cefre00</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=12232</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi All,<br />
<br />
I just wanted post this hear, it's pretty new now and might be interesting for our beloved PBP, the announcement mentioned AMD64 only. Over time I guess would come to ARM64 too.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-web-remix/19394" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-web-remix/19394</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi All,<br />
<br />
I just wanted post this hear, it's pretty new now and might be interesting for our beloved PBP, the announcement mentioned AMD64 only. Over time I guess would come to ARM64 too.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-web-remix/19394" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-web-remix/19394</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FydeOS for You - Pinebook Pro]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=12201</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=20350">also1412</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=12201</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Greetings from FydeOS!<br />
<br />
We have now released the first FydeOS for You - Pinebook Pro v11.2. Inspired by the previous Chromium OS build produced by <a href="https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Ayufan-rock64</a>, this has been 2 months of hard work from our dev team. Build artefacts can be found <a href="https://github.com/FydeOS-for-You-overlays" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>, download links as below:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://download.fydeos.io/FydeOS_Pinebook_Pro_v11.2.img.xz" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://download.fydeos.io/FydeOS_Pinebo...1.2.img.xz</a><br />
<a href="https://fydeos.cowtransfer.com/s/ee11aa4238f745" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://fydeos.cowtransfer.com/s/ee11aa4238f745</a><br />
<br />
Please read the full release note and install instruction <a href="https://releases.fydeos.io/11.2/pinebook-pro" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>.<br />
<br />
For technical support, please use <a href="https://community.fydeos.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">FydeOS Community</a> and our <a href="https://t.me/hi_fydeos" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Telegram Group</a>.<br />
<br />
Enjoy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Greetings from FydeOS!<br />
<br />
We have now released the first FydeOS for You - Pinebook Pro v11.2. Inspired by the previous Chromium OS build produced by <a href="https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Ayufan-rock64</a>, this has been 2 months of hard work from our dev team. Build artefacts can be found <a href="https://github.com/FydeOS-for-You-overlays" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>, download links as below:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://download.fydeos.io/FydeOS_Pinebook_Pro_v11.2.img.xz" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://download.fydeos.io/FydeOS_Pinebo...1.2.img.xz</a><br />
<a href="https://fydeos.cowtransfer.com/s/ee11aa4238f745" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://fydeos.cowtransfer.com/s/ee11aa4238f745</a><br />
<br />
Please read the full release note and install instruction <a href="https://releases.fydeos.io/11.2/pinebook-pro" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>.<br />
<br />
For technical support, please use <a href="https://community.fydeos.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">FydeOS Community</a> and our <a href="https://t.me/hi_fydeos" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Telegram Group</a>.<br />
<br />
Enjoy!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cant login to a new install of ChromeOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=12086</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=20123">flatulent_piney</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=12086</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[When I got my pbp back in August/Sept I tried the newest version of ayufan's chromeos build and poked around a little before moving on to other distros.  I recently had a reason to go back to chromeos and cannot login.  I have reflashed the sd card with 3 different version of chromeos and get messages about my account not being verified, but I can still sogn in as a guest and access gmail and such from inside the guest browser.<br />
<br />
Doing web searches on this this problem reveals that it isnt exactly uncommon, but that a "powerwash" is the key to resetting a regular chromebook and fixing the issue.  The key combos for powerwashing do not work however (prompts restart but never prompts to begin powerwash), and there really shouldnt be a need to powerwash a freshly installed sd card anyway right?   <br />
<br />
My best guess is that there is some sort of leftovers from the first chromeos sdcard that I poked around with somewhere/somehow on the actual pbp and google isnt allowing sign-in.  I am using a different sd card, and have tried the same on also, and as I said befiore I have tried 3 different of ayufan's build.  None will let me sign in as anything other than guest.  Any thoughts and help are appreciated.  Ty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[When I got my pbp back in August/Sept I tried the newest version of ayufan's chromeos build and poked around a little before moving on to other distros.  I recently had a reason to go back to chromeos and cannot login.  I have reflashed the sd card with 3 different version of chromeos and get messages about my account not being verified, but I can still sogn in as a guest and access gmail and such from inside the guest browser.<br />
<br />
Doing web searches on this this problem reveals that it isnt exactly uncommon, but that a "powerwash" is the key to resetting a regular chromebook and fixing the issue.  The key combos for powerwashing do not work however (prompts restart but never prompts to begin powerwash), and there really shouldnt be a need to powerwash a freshly installed sd card anyway right?   <br />
<br />
My best guess is that there is some sort of leftovers from the first chromeos sdcard that I poked around with somewhere/somehow on the actual pbp and google isnt allowing sign-in.  I am using a different sd card, and have tried the same on also, and as I said befiore I have tried 3 different of ayufan's build.  None will let me sign in as anything other than guest.  Any thoughts and help are appreciated.  Ty]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CrOS boot from sd, now pinebook doesn't boot anymore]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=10322</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=18288">qdoy55d9wkn8zw</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=10322</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Recently I've received the pinebook pro, really happy! Worked great. Then I had in mind to try out Chromium.<br />
<br />
I formatted my SD card, and DD'ed the chromium image on it:<br />
<a href="https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php?title=PinebookPro_Software_Release#Chromium" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php?title=...e#Chromium</a><br />
<br />
Turned of my pinebook pro, and tried to boot from the sd card. Yet all I got was a black screen. I've then turned off the device by holding the power key, removed the SD card, yet it seems it's not even booting Manjaro anymore.<br />
<br />
I really don't get how booting from the SD could break boot in general. Maybe any of you has a clue? What can I best do next?<br />
<br />
Thank you so much in advance!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Recently I've received the pinebook pro, really happy! Worked great. Then I had in mind to try out Chromium.<br />
<br />
I formatted my SD card, and DD'ed the chromium image on it:<br />
<a href="https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php?title=PinebookPro_Software_Release#Chromium" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php?title=...e#Chromium</a><br />
<br />
Turned of my pinebook pro, and tried to boot from the sd card. Yet all I got was a black screen. I've then turned off the device by holding the power key, removed the SD card, yet it seems it's not even booting Manjaro anymore.<br />
<br />
I really don't get how booting from the SD could break boot in general. Maybe any of you has a clue? What can I best do next?<br />
<br />
Thank you so much in advance!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Panfrost and CrOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9695</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=12077">tophneal</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9695</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Was just catching up on threads from over the weekend, when I came across <a href="https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9689&amp;pid=64459#pid64459" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">this post</a>, specifically:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">maxjrh:</span><br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite><span style="color: #666666;" class="mycode_color">Binaries called "chrome" or "chromium" are explicitly blacklisted by the panfrost driver.</span></blockquote>
<br />
Even though it's been established that waiting for 5.7 will be best for mainlining efforts, I recalled you mentioned having issues with getting Panfrost to play nicely, <dvz_me_placeholder id="0" />. Figured I'd share this, as it may have be contributing to that issue. Hopefully this will be helpful for whenever someone updates CrOS next.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Was just catching up on threads from over the weekend, when I came across <a href="https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9689&amp;pid=64459#pid64459" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">this post</a>, specifically:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">maxjrh:</span><br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite><span style="color: #666666;" class="mycode_color">Binaries called "chrome" or "chromium" are explicitly blacklisted by the panfrost driver.</span></blockquote>
<br />
Even though it's been established that waiting for 5.7 will be best for mainlining efforts, I recalled you mentioned having issues with getting Panfrost to play nicely, <dvz_me_placeholder id="0" />. Figured I'd share this, as it may have be contributing to that issue. Hopefully this will be helpful for whenever someone updates CrOS next.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Internal Display issues]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9469</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=17076">Mattmig</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9469</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I received my heavily anticipated PBP on Monday. I've had a great time learning about ROCK64 and the differences needed to work on this platform vs x86 and x64<br />
<br />
I've followed a few guides and tested out a few of the images (Debian, Bionic Mate, Manjaro). I have Manjaro currently loaded on eMMC. I'd like to continue to test other images via SD cards. <br />
<br />
I loaded the Chromium image on a known working card with the PBP and used Etcher to write the image. It appeared to load fine but no internal display. Video output was not there. I had a similar issue when tested the Bionic Mate image and found that if I connected to a monitor via USBC I would get a display there but not on the internal laptop. Same issue with Chromium. <br />
<br />
Is there a known issue when switching between images and boot options where the internal display does not function? <br />
<br />
Thanks all, Great community here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I received my heavily anticipated PBP on Monday. I've had a great time learning about ROCK64 and the differences needed to work on this platform vs x86 and x64<br />
<br />
I've followed a few guides and tested out a few of the images (Debian, Bionic Mate, Manjaro). I have Manjaro currently loaded on eMMC. I'd like to continue to test other images via SD cards. <br />
<br />
I loaded the Chromium image on a known working card with the PBP and used Etcher to write the image. It appeared to load fine but no internal display. Video output was not there. I had a similar issue when tested the Bionic Mate image and found that if I connected to a monitor via USBC I would get a display there but not on the internal laptop. Same issue with Chromium. <br />
<br />
Is there a known issue when switching between images and boot options where the internal display does not function? <br />
<br />
Thanks all, Great community here.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CrOS debugging request]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9213</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=11332">brent.thierens</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9213</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all<br />
<br />
I have been working on a CrOS79 image with the mainline kernel. I have built an image, and it can be found here: <a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-72xu8VUWR05zbli6uHQ-es7ka5HoLd9" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-72xu8...s7ka5HoLd9</a><br />
However, the image doesn't boot and does not give any output to the screen. Is there anyone out there with a debugging console cable that can help me out here? <img src="https://forum.pine64.org/images/smilies/smile.png" alt="Smile" title="Smile" class="smilie smilie_1" /> I'm stumbling in the dark right now<br />
<br />
Help appreciated!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi all<br />
<br />
I have been working on a CrOS79 image with the mainline kernel. I have built an image, and it can be found here: <a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-72xu8VUWR05zbli6uHQ-es7ka5HoLd9" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-72xu8...s7ka5HoLd9</a><br />
However, the image doesn't boot and does not give any output to the screen. Is there anyone out there with a debugging console cable that can help me out here? <img src="https://forum.pine64.org/images/smilies/smile.png" alt="Smile" title="Smile" class="smilie smilie_1" /> I'm stumbling in the dark right now<br />
<br />
Help appreciated!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Looking to commission a new Chromium build (COMMUNITY BOUNTY)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8676</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=12077">tophneal</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8676</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey there, fellow Piners!<br />
<br />
I know it's not the most popular OS option for the PBP, but I love the simplicity and features available in ChromiumOS. I currently run ayufan's R77 build on my eMMC, and it's awesome, but I'd really like to see a working Crostini, and Android apps, if possible. The initial Chromium images were ready and available by the time most started getting their PBPs, and I imagine could probably benefit from some of the improvements from other kernels, since then.<br />
<br />
From what I can tell ayufan is pretty busy with expanding the Linux support for the PBP, so I don't want to bother him with any requests. That man has given this community a lot of software already. I know I've used a lot of his builds across several Pine devices. I've tried to take this on myself as well, but I keep finding build documentation that isn't fully up-to-date and stops my progress, Google has been blocking me from setting up the necessary APIs, and plainly: I have no idea what the hell I'm doing.<br />
<br />
This brings me to here and now. I'd like to commission a developer to create a more featured Chromium build for the community. As stated above, I know I really want to see a build with working<ul class="mycode_list"><li>Crostini<br />
</li>
<li>Android apps (from what I've read I think Android apps should work if Linux Beta does) This should get easier as CrOS develops and transitions to using ARCVM.<br />
</li>
<li>the built-in cam (Currently works when using setup/settings to take a profile picture, but nowhere else.)<br />
</li>
<li>r<span style="text-decoration: line-through;" class="mycode_s">etain suspend functionality (most of the OS options, especially with mainline kernels, seem to have lost this)</span> At this point, I already know we'll have to make sacrifices to maintain S3 sleep. From what I understand it's possible to use up to v5.8 for the kernel with BSP uboot, though.<br />
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: line-through;" class="mycode_s">one of the modified u-boots with SD or NVMe boot priority</span> Now the latest mrfixit2001 BSP uboot already includes the traditional and additional boot priorities. Mainline uboot also includes these, in addition to USB IIRC.<br />
</li>
</ul>
If any other users feel I left something off here, please chime in.<br />
<br />
I'm more than happy to contribute monetarily to anyone able to take this on, in addition to any testing, and hope that other users who would enjoy this image will too.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">EDIT: The money pool can be found here: <a href="https://paypal.me/pools/c/8lzjzMkXjw" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://paypal.me/pools/c/8lzjzMkXjw</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;" class="mycode_s"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">EDIT2:</span> I just purchased an ANSI model from a user, so when it arrives, I could potentially provide my ISO to any developer that would like to take this on, but doesn't have a PBP.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">EDIT 3:</span> Interested in tackling this challenge, but lack the development resources? (CrOS requires a lot of space and X86 to build.) <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Contact me directly</span>, and we can discuss providing you access to one of my servers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey there, fellow Piners!<br />
<br />
I know it's not the most popular OS option for the PBP, but I love the simplicity and features available in ChromiumOS. I currently run ayufan's R77 build on my eMMC, and it's awesome, but I'd really like to see a working Crostini, and Android apps, if possible. The initial Chromium images were ready and available by the time most started getting their PBPs, and I imagine could probably benefit from some of the improvements from other kernels, since then.<br />
<br />
From what I can tell ayufan is pretty busy with expanding the Linux support for the PBP, so I don't want to bother him with any requests. That man has given this community a lot of software already. I know I've used a lot of his builds across several Pine devices. I've tried to take this on myself as well, but I keep finding build documentation that isn't fully up-to-date and stops my progress, Google has been blocking me from setting up the necessary APIs, and plainly: I have no idea what the hell I'm doing.<br />
<br />
This brings me to here and now. I'd like to commission a developer to create a more featured Chromium build for the community. As stated above, I know I really want to see a build with working<ul class="mycode_list"><li>Crostini<br />
</li>
<li>Android apps (from what I've read I think Android apps should work if Linux Beta does) This should get easier as CrOS develops and transitions to using ARCVM.<br />
</li>
<li>the built-in cam (Currently works when using setup/settings to take a profile picture, but nowhere else.)<br />
</li>
<li>r<span style="text-decoration: line-through;" class="mycode_s">etain suspend functionality (most of the OS options, especially with mainline kernels, seem to have lost this)</span> At this point, I already know we'll have to make sacrifices to maintain S3 sleep. From what I understand it's possible to use up to v5.8 for the kernel with BSP uboot, though.<br />
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: line-through;" class="mycode_s">one of the modified u-boots with SD or NVMe boot priority</span> Now the latest mrfixit2001 BSP uboot already includes the traditional and additional boot priorities. Mainline uboot also includes these, in addition to USB IIRC.<br />
</li>
</ul>
If any other users feel I left something off here, please chime in.<br />
<br />
I'm more than happy to contribute monetarily to anyone able to take this on, in addition to any testing, and hope that other users who would enjoy this image will too.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">EDIT: The money pool can be found here: <a href="https://paypal.me/pools/c/8lzjzMkXjw" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://paypal.me/pools/c/8lzjzMkXjw</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;" class="mycode_s"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">EDIT2:</span> I just purchased an ANSI model from a user, so when it arrives, I could potentially provide my ISO to any developer that would like to take this on, but doesn't have a PBP.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">EDIT 3:</span> Interested in tackling this challenge, but lack the development resources? (CrOS requires a lot of space and X86 to build.) <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Contact me directly</span>, and we can discuss providing you access to one of my servers.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chromium OS 78?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8524</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2019 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=14792">obyknovenius</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8524</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there any chance to see Chromium OS 78 on Pinebook Pro any time soon?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is there any chance to see Chromium OS 78 on Pinebook Pro any time soon?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Does the Pinebook Pro support chromium developer mode?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8447</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=15626">TDC_PBP</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8447</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Out of curiosity, I have tried putting the Pinebook Pro into developer mode via holding esc and F3 during boot, but it seems not to "see" that I am holding the keys down, booting to the login screen like normal. Is chromium developer mode not supported on the Pinebook Pro? I have Chromium installed on my emmc via Wizzard's AWESOME Dual booting chromium and linux tutorial.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Out of curiosity, I have tried putting the Pinebook Pro into developer mode via holding esc and F3 during boot, but it seems not to "see" that I am holding the keys down, booting to the login screen like normal. Is chromium developer mode not supported on the Pinebook Pro? I have Chromium installed on my emmc via Wizzard's AWESOME Dual booting chromium and linux tutorial.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Android Phone Setting Managed By Administrator?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8438</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=15626">TDC_PBP</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8438</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[As I was exploring Chromium settings, I stumbled across the connected devices tab, with the setting to connect your android phone to the laptop underneath it. It is, however, greyed out, saying "This setting is enforced by your administrator." Is that just its way of saying that isn't supported right now? As far as I know the administrator of my PBP is me...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[As I was exploring Chromium settings, I stumbled across the connected devices tab, with the setting to connect your android phone to the laptop underneath it. It is, however, greyed out, saying "This setting is enforced by your administrator." Is that just its way of saying that isn't supported right now? As far as I know the administrator of my PBP is me...]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Using Crouton to install Arch]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8432</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.pine64.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=12077">tophneal</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=8432</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I wanted to share this, after trying so many different forks. For anyone interested in using crouton to install Arch, <a href="https://github.com/mediocregopher/chroagh" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">refer to this fork of chroagh</a>. I tried/edited about 4 other forks, but this buried beauty has actually allowed me to install aarch64 Arch within Chromium.<br />
<br />
Since it's outdated, you'll likely need to run   sudo enter-chroot -n [chroot name] -u root   in order to be able to login/finish setup.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wanted to share this, after trying so many different forks. For anyone interested in using crouton to install Arch, <a href="https://github.com/mediocregopher/chroagh" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">refer to this fork of chroagh</a>. I tried/edited about 4 other forks, but this buried beauty has actually allowed me to install aarch64 Arch within Chromium.<br />
<br />
Since it's outdated, you'll likely need to run   sudo enter-chroot -n [chroot name] -u root   in order to be able to login/finish setup.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>