![]() |
MX-Linux; antiX Linux - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: Pinebook (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=76) +--- Forum: Linux on Pinebook (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=79) +--- Thread: MX-Linux; antiX Linux (/showthread.php?tid=7228) |
MX-Linux; antiX Linux - chessie - 03-05-2019 The MX-Linux and antiX-Linux distributions are very similar, and have become quite popular. MX-Linux has held the #1 position on Distrowatch for the past 3 months (beating out Linux Mint by a two-to-one margin, no less), and antiX-base is (almost) a full featured version of MX (a truly full-featured distro at 1200 MB--MX 17.3), and about 2/3 the size--approx. 800 MB vs 1200MB / 1400 MB (MX-17.3 / MX-18). Does any one know if the PineBook group has any plans to engage with MX / antiX? It seems as if this would be a really good move on PineBook's part. Does any one have any ideas on the difficulty--or lack thereof--of installing MX-Linux 17.3 / 18.1 on the PineBook Pro if it is not a 'supported distribution'? RE: MX-Linux; antiX Linux - tllim - 03-06-2019 (03-05-2019, 06:27 AM)chessie Wrote: The MX-Linux and antiX-Linux distributions are very similar, and have become quite popular. MX-Linux has held the #1 position on Distrowatch for the past 3 months (beating out Linux Mint by a two-to-one margin, no less), and antiX-base is (almost) a full featured version of MX (a truly full-featured distro at 1200 MB--MX 17.3), and about 2/3 the size--approx. 800 MB vs 1200MB / 1400 MB (MX-17.3 / MX-18). The best way is ping MX-Linux forum and ask for Pinebook. MX-Linx developers can email to info@pine64.org and we will provide Pinebook for them. RE: MX-Linux; antiX Linux - chessie - 04-14-2019 (03-06-2019, 04:30 PM)tllim Wrote:(03-05-2019, 06:27 AM)chessie Wrote: The MX-Linux and antiX-Linux distributions are very similar, and have become quite popular. MX-Linux has held the #1 position on Distrowatch for the past 3 months (beating out Linux Mint by a two-to-one margin, no less), and antiX-base is (almost) a full featured version of MX (a truly full-featured distro at 1200 MB--MX 17.3), and about 2/3 the size--approx. 800 MB vs 1200MB / 1400 MB (MX-17.3 / MX-18). I assume you have not heard from the people at MX-Linux. Shortly after I received your reply, I sent an email to the MX-Linux group, doing as you suggested. Unfortunately--I think--I used the "Contact Us" icon on their website, I'm not at all certain that's the proper way to get their attention, as I discovered today when trying to determine the status of my request (for you) to them, I found this information associated with the "Contact Us" icon (in red letters): "This email address is for website problems...". I am in the process of formally, officially registering as a member of the MX-Linux / antiX Linux Forums and user group(s), and will pursue your suggestion through those channels. Warmest regards... RE: MX-Linux; antiX Linux - tllim - 04-15-2019 (04-14-2019, 02:32 PM)chessie Wrote:Appreciate and thanks on your follow up with MX-Linux. Please PM me when you received encourage news from them. Please note that sometimes when I getting busy and respond back in few days later.(03-06-2019, 04:30 PM)tllim Wrote:(03-05-2019, 06:27 AM)chessie Wrote: The MX-Linux and antiX-Linux distributions are very similar, and have become quite popular. MX-Linux has held the #1 position on Distrowatch for the past 3 months (beating out Linux Mint by a two-to-one margin, no less), and antiX-base is (almost) a full featured version of MX (a truly full-featured distro at 1200 MB--MX 17.3), and about 2/3 the size--approx. 800 MB vs 1200MB / 1400 MB (MX-17.3 / MX-18). |