![]() |
Pinebook using the Rock64? - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: Pinebook (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=76) +--- Forum: General Discussion on Pinebook (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=77) +--- Thread: Pinebook using the Rock64? (/showthread.php?tid=5437) |
Pinebook using the Rock64? - BobCollins - 12-08-2017 What are the chances of a premium Pinebook using your Rock64 SBC design? As I see it, there are several advantages to a Rock64-based design.
What do you think? RE: Pinebook using the Rock64? - naviathan - 01-11-2018 I'd buy it. RE: Pinebook using the Rock64? - tllim - 01-16-2018 We are currently exploring into this path. Stay tuned. RE: Pinebook using the Rock64? - z4v4l - 01-16-2018 like then it would better to put there rk3399, no? ![]() Quote:1. Rocketchip has moved beyond binary blobs that Allwinner requiresthis is a non argument. this is zealotry for ones and the subject for stupid parroting for others. consumers give no sh!t about this. but this is a lie too. Rockchip didn't even manage to supply full Manuals. Open the RK3328 manual and what you'll see? UART and GPIO. and that's all! this is a joke. Not even eMMC controller. Finally, since when Rockchip has opened its binary blobs with DRAM initiliazation? Did i miss something? RE: Pinebook using the Rock64? - hojnikb - 01-17-2018 (01-16-2018, 12:03 AM)tllim Wrote: We are currently exploring into this path. Stay tuned. Any chance for a H6 based version ? It seems to have almost everything a laptop need. Only thing it does need is a pmic, that supports battery (Reference axp805 does not). |