PINE64
Time Capsule - failing getting libkrb5-dev - Printable Version

+- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org)
+-- Forum: PINE A64(+) (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Linux on Pine A64(+) (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+---- Forum: Debian (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Thread: Time Capsule - failing getting libkrb5-dev (/showthread.php?tid=2284)

Time Capsule - failing getting libkrb5-dev - wojciech_czyz - 09-28-2016

Hi,

I have been trying to get working Time Capsule using Debian of Pine64, yet following many of the threads there are always some problems.
I am stuck getting libkrb5-dev:

Code:
sudo apt-get install build-essential devscripts debhelper cdbs autotools-dev dh-buildinfo libdb-dev libwrap0-dev libpam0g-dev libcups2-dev libkrb5-dev libltdl3-dev libgcrypt11-dev libcrack2-dev libavahi-client-dev libldap2-dev libacl1-dev libevent-dev d-shlibs dh-systemd avahi-daemon libc6-dev libnss-mdns

Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libkrb5-dev : Depends: krb5-multidev (= 1.12.1+dfsg-19+deb8u2) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


I used the image from Pine64.pro

Debian Mate (3.10.102 BSP 2), Released Jul 18 2016

Updated kernel, uboot and packages, yet always get this.

Is there solution for this?

Thank you!
Wojciech

RE: Time Capsule - failing getting libkrb5-dev - pfeerick - 09-28-2016

I hit some problems (as did others) with installing some other packages on the pine64 debian distro, which appear to be related to the choice of packages pre-installed. If you are willing, it may be worth looking into trying out the DietPi distro for pine64, as that is also debian based, but for at least some of the 'uninstallable' packages (due to broken dependencies) seems to be a much cleaner base.