![]() |
Wifi with iwd and/or connman ? - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: PineTab (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=140) +--- Forum: PineTab Software (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=142) +--- Thread: Wifi with iwd and/or connman ? (/showthread.php?tid=19781) |
Wifi with iwd and/or connman ? - louson - 04-06-2025 Hello, Is there any chance for the wifi to work with iwd instead o? with connman ? So far I got an input/output error, then I wonder if there is any specific patch or configuration to work with NetworkManager/wpa_supplicant. RE: Wifi with iwd and/or connman ? - louson - 04-06-2025 (Yesterday, 04:33 AM)louson Wrote: Is there any chance for the wifi to work with iwd instead o? with connman ? *iwd instead of wpa_supplicant RE: Wifi with iwd and/or connman ? - Kevin Kofler - 04-06-2025 The first question would be: What are you trying to fix by switching the backend? Is the default setup not working for you? Next: Not all combinations make sense: iwd is an alternative to wpa_supplicant and cannot be used together with it, connman is an alternative to NetworkManager and cannot be used together with it. It is also possible to use iwd or wpa_supplicant in standalone mode, without NetworkManager or connman, but the higher-level layers add extra convenience. But before changing your setup, it would make more sense to try to fix the one that is already there, if it is even broken to begin with. The wpa_supplicant and NetworkManager stack is the default in most distributions today. |