Star64: a first benchmark - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: General (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Getting Started (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +--- Thread: Star64: a first benchmark (/showthread.php?tid=18278) |
Star64: a first benchmark - Der Geist der Maschine - 05-29-2023 In these days, I play around with different kernel configs and patches. While doing so, I collected data about the star64's speed. Build time Fishwaldo's kernel 5.15.107: Code: $ make pine64_star64_defconfig or Code: $ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- pine64_star64_defconfig Star64 4 cores (armbian 23.05, gcc 12.02.0) DOB 2023 - $130 Code: -j1: real 214m51.028s user 201m28.062s sys 12m31.241s Lenovo G510 laptop i7-4700 2.4GHz 4 cores (8 threads) (debian 12, gcc 12.02.0) DOB 2014 - $754 Code: -j1: real 50m59.833s user 46m39.686s sys 4m14.694s [we would probably get a little bit more when utilizing threads] Apple imac7 desktop core2 extreme X7900 2 cores 2.8GHz (debian 12, gcc 12.02.0) DOB 2007, $10 from craigslist Code: -j1: real 70m26.178s user 63m19.755s sys 6m34.567s We have it that a 9 year old laptop is 4.91 times faster than the star64 and a 16 year old desktop is is 1.63 times faster than the star64 (real time on max number of cores). Note, that is the OOB (out of box) experience for most of us. The star64 should be faster with additional investments for eMMC or NvME drives. As of today, the graphics experience is quite frustrating, see https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=18254&pid=117576. That should eventually change. |