+- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org)
+-- Forum: Pinebook Pro (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+--- Forum: General Discussion on Pinebook Pro (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=112)
+--- Thread: Cloud backup recommendations (/showthread.php?tid=10348)
Cloud backup recommendations - Phillip Bell - 06-19-2020
Requirements:
1. Must be compatible with Arch and ARM64 (Mega is not, Dropbox is not)
2. Must be E2E encrypted
3. Fees not outrageous (I'm looking at you, Cloudberry, now something-something-360)
I'm willing to pay for a solution, but can't find one, really.
RE: Cloud backup recommendations - qchapter1 - 06-19-2020
I use IDRIVE. They have a set of scripts that are linux compatible that work very well for backups and restores. ARM is supported, but if you're using a 64bit kernel with a 32bit userspace you will need to modify some code to get the scripts to pull the right dependencies for your userspace. If you're running AArch64 you should be fine.
RE: Cloud backup recommendations - Syonyk - 06-20-2020
How much data, and how frequently are you backing it up?
rsync meets your requirements, assuming you've got a remote endpoint that supports it...
RE: Cloud backup recommendations - Phillip Bell - 07-13-2020
(06-20-2020, 05:40 PM)Syonyk Wrote: How much data, and how frequently are you backing it up?
rsync meets your requirements, assuming you've got a remote endpoint that supports it...
Yeah, it's more the endpoint that I am interested in. I can write my own backup scripts, but I'm looking for recommendations on service providers.
RE: Cloud backup recommendations - rmtodd - 07-14-2020
(06-19-2020, 04:06 PM)Phillip Bell Wrote: Requirements:
1. Must be compatible with Arch and ARM64 (Mega is not, Dropbox is not)
2. Must be E2E encrypted
3. Fees not outrageous (I'm looking at you, Cloudberry, now something-something-360)
I'm willing to pay for a solution, but can't find one, really.
Have you looked at tarsnap.com? I don't use Arch Linux, but https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/List_of_applications/Security lists it on their list of applications (and if they didn't, the client is open source). Definitely E2E encrypted. Only part that might be a problem is #3, depending on your definition of "outrageous" on fees.