![]() |
PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: PineTime (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=134) +--- Forum: General Discussion on PineTime (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=135) +--- Thread: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion (/showthread.php?tid=7973) |
RE: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - fire219 - 10-25-2019 (10-25-2019, 09:20 AM)przemko Wrote:(10-25-2019, 09:04 AM)fire219 Wrote: Moved thread to the PineTime subforum, since we have that now. RF is not any more dangerous than light transmission. They're both forms of electromagnetic radiation, and both are low enough energy to not be able to cause ionizing damage to organic substances. The only way either of them is dangerous is if they are so intense that they literally start heating up your body. A WiFi or Bluetooth device is several orders of magnitude too low energy to do that. The Sun also causes far more EM radiation (even in the radio/microwave wavelengths) on Earth than all of humanity's electronic creations combined. That being said, there probably will be a way to turn off Bluetooth on the PineTime. (It does not have WiFi.) RE: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - larzuk - 10-26-2019 I won't feed the troll here, but standing outside bareskin should be way more dangerous than eating a turned on WiFi Access point. Also why the heck an electrosensible dude would buy a smartwatch? This bullshit looks like a scam, and i don't see how it could be a serious subject anyway. If the goal is to advertise some beliefs, i don't think it's the right place neither. ** i made some quick researches, and a bit of OSINT, all those links and barnum bias are big fat cables for selling alternative therapy and books about anti-scientific communities *** RE: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - ivanB1975 - 02-05-2020 There are effects that are non-thermal known since a while in literature. An example: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29884549 RE: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - mms - 03-26-2020 Since I support this project and I'm curious I will of course buy at least one PineTime watch, but I won't wear it regulary. It' just too ugly. It might be a good idea to start with a very cheap device to get the movement started but the next version should be more luxurious. I think there is a demand for 200 to 300 € or USD smart watches. RE: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - WarpLover - 09-09-2020 (10-15-2019, 05:40 AM)DrYak Wrote: Thinking about two medical/health applications of such cheap device: RE: PineTime smartwatch - a Linux Phone companion - zer0sig - 10-26-2020 (09-09-2020, 09:52 AM)WarpLover Wrote: Reliability of the switch (no false positives on the switch) and reliable connection to the base unit from common areas of the home would be important. I think a model or OS build with similar functions as stated purpose would be cool, but I wouldn't advise PINE to market a device with that purpose so much as to make it easy for someone to develop feature functionality. When you start building and designing emergency mitigation devices, you run into a whole mountain of regulation and liability in most developed nations, probably in most nations on the whole. Either one are likely to cost far more than PINE has available. OTOH, a device with a reliable, stable and configurable "call home" feature and that has a few simple preconfigured dialogue options that one might configure on, say, a Pinephone or similar to text to a configurable recipient could be very helpful to some people. |