Collaboration from Allwinner - Printable Version

Collaboration from Allwinner - Printable Version

+- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org)
+-- Forum: PINE A64(+) (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Linux on Pine A64(+) (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Collaboration from Allwinner (/showthread.php?tid=110)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - tllim - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 04:38 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(02-27-2016, 02:03 PM)tllim Wrote:
(02-26-2016, 09:28 AM)KryPtAlIvIaN Wrote: Any updates? :-)

Meeting with Allwinner went well. They have interest to support mainline kernel development and I have already link up Sunxi team with Allwinner.

Very good news! Hope that's leading to a result!

Still keep my finger cross, only consider as good news when actual deliver.

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - Tassadar - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 09:47 AM)tllim Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 04:38 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(02-27-2016, 02:03 PM)tllim Wrote:
(02-26-2016, 09:28 AM)KryPtAlIvIaN Wrote: Any updates? :-)

Meeting with Allwinner went well. They have interest to support mainline kernel development and I have already link up Sunxi team with Allwinner.

Very good news! Hope that's leading to a result!

Still keep my finger cross, only consider as good news when actual deliver.

Ok thanks! Could you keep update us on this topic? If i've understood correctly there's no agreement but just a simple interest isn't it?

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - joe - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 10:12 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 09:47 AM)tllim Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 04:38 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(02-27-2016, 02:03 PM)tllim Wrote:
(02-26-2016, 09:28 AM)KryPtAlIvIaN Wrote: Any updates? :-)

Meeting with Allwinner went well. They have interest to support mainline kernel development and I have already link up Sunxi team with Allwinner.

Very good news! Hope that's leading to a result!

Still keep my finger cross, only consider as good news when actual deliver.

Ok thanks! Could you keep update us on this topic? If i've understood correctly there's no agreement but just a simple interest isn't it?

This is business to converse , update for what you want ?
Detail you don't need to know , you want know about pine64 business thing?

you want the answer is , Oh , yes , so then ?
and the answer is , Oh , no , so then ?

I think ............this is none of your business ! [Image: dodgy.png]

@tllim , no need to update this topic , this is your business , is not some one business

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - janjwerner - 03-02-2016

@joe
Dude relax. The question about Allwinner contributing more to open-source community is vital for all of us. My understanding is that there are some talks between one of the developers from linux-sunxi with Allwinner. This is more of business to community conversation so you shouldn't get all fired up.
Transparency in community founded project is one of the basis of the trust so this question is valid and in place.
Cheers
Jan

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - Tassadar - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 11:30 AM)joe Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 10:12 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 09:47 AM)tllim Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 04:38 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(02-27-2016, 02:03 PM)tllim Wrote: Meeting with Allwinner went well. They have interest to support mainline kernel development and I have already link up Sunxi team with Allwinner.

Very good news! Hope that's leading to a result!

Still keep my finger cross, only consider as good news when actual deliver.

Ok thanks! Could you keep update us on this topic? If i've understood correctly there's no agreement but just a simple interest isn't it?

This is business to converse , update for what you want ?
Detail you don't need to know , you want know about pine64 business thing?

you want the answer is , Oh , yes , so then ?
and the answer is , Oh , no , so then ?

I think ............this is none of your business !

@tllim , no need to update this topic , this is your business , is not some one business

I can't really believe what i'm reading. Pine64 ask people to support their project but people have no rights to ask how the project is evolving?! Perhaps just a clarification about something told by the team?!

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - Ghost - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 12:12 PM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 11:30 AM)joe Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 10:12 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 09:47 AM)tllim Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 04:38 AM)Tassadar Wrote: Very good news! Hope that's leading to a result!

Still keep my finger cross, only consider as good news when actual deliver.

Ok thanks! Could you keep update us on this topic? If i've understood correctly there's no agreement but just a simple interest isn't it?

This is business to converse , update for what you want ?
Detail you don't need to know , you want know about pine64 business thing?

you want the answer is , Oh , yes , so then ?
and the answer is , Oh , no , so then ?

I think ............this is none of your business !

@tllim , no need to update this topic , this is your business , is not some one business

I can't really believe what i'm reading. Pine64 ask people to support their project but people have no rights to ask how the project is evolving?! Perhaps just a clarification about something told by the team?!

I think it's fair to say that Joe has miscontrued something here. Joe is a very staunch supporter/defender of Pine64, I think he misunderstood the intent behind the innocent enough question, seeing it perhaps as a request to share private business details? Well, it's hard to say exactly what he thought you meant, there is a language/understanding barrier in place.

But don't worry, Joe's bark is worse than his bite Smile

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - joe - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 03:21 PM)SkairkrohBule Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 12:12 PM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 11:30 AM)joe Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 10:12 AM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 09:47 AM)tllim Wrote: Still keep my finger cross, only consider as good news when actual deliver.

Ok thanks! Could you keep update us on this topic? If i've understood correctly there's no agreement but just a simple interest isn't it?

This is business to converse , update for what you want ?
Detail you don't need to know , you want know about pine64 business thing?

you want the answer is , Oh , yes , so then ?
and the answer is , Oh , no , so then ?

I think ............this is none of your business !

@tllim , no need to update this topic , this is your business , is not some one business

I can't really believe what i'm reading. Pine64 ask people to support their project but people have no rights to ask how the project is evolving?! Perhaps just a clarification about something told by the team?!

I think it's fair to say that Joe has miscontrued something here. Joe is a very staunch supporter/defender of Pine64, I think he misunderstood the intent behind the innocent enough question, seeing it perhaps as a request to share private business details? Well, it's hard to say exactly what he thought you meant, there is a language/understanding barrier in place.

But don't worry, Joe's bark is worse than his bite

I support this project , but i don't have need to know more answer , i am not the defender.

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - Ghost - 03-02-2016

(03-02-2016, 05:31 PM)joe Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 03:21 PM)SkairkrohBule Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 12:12 PM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 11:30 AM)joe Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 10:12 AM)Tassadar Wrote: Ok thanks! Could you keep update us on this topic? If i've understood correctly there's no agreement but just a simple interest isn't it?

This is business to converse , update for what you want ?
Detail you don't need to know , you want know about pine64 business thing?

you want the answer is , Oh , yes , so then ?
and the answer is , Oh , no , so then ?

I think ............this is none of your business !

@tllim , no need to update this topic , this is your business , is not some one business

I can't really believe what i'm reading. Pine64 ask people to support their project but people have no rights to ask how the project is evolving?! Perhaps just a clarification about something told by the team?!

I think it's fair to say that Joe has miscontrued something here. Joe is a very staunch supporter/defender of Pine64, I think he misunderstood the intent behind the innocent enough question, seeing it perhaps as a request to share private business details? Well, it's hard to say exactly what he thought you meant, there is a language/understanding barrier in place.

But don't worry, Joe's bark is worse than his bite

I support this proiect , but i don't have need to know more answer , i am not the defender.

Hi Joe!

Well ok, that's fine, just be aware a lot of people are here to obtain information and ask questions, with the hope of getting answers.

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - jaysonraymond - 03-08-2016

(03-02-2016, 06:20 PM)SkairkrohBule Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 05:31 PM)joe Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 03:21 PM)SkairkrohBule Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 12:12 PM)Tassadar Wrote:
(03-02-2016, 11:30 AM)joe Wrote: This is business to converse , update for what you want ?
Detail you don't need to know , you want know about pine64 business thing?

you want the answer is , Oh , yes , so then ?
and the answer is , Oh , no , so then ?

I think ............this is none of your business !

@tllim , no need to update this topic , this is your business , is not some one business

I can't really believe what i'm reading. Pine64 ask people to support their project but people have no rights to ask how the project is evolving?! Perhaps just a clarification about something told by the team?!

I think it's fair to say that Joe has miscontrued something here. Joe is a very staunch supporter/defender of Pine64, I think he misunderstood the intent behind the innocent enough question, seeing it perhaps as a request to share private business details? Well, it's hard to say exactly what he thought you meant, there is a language/understanding barrier in place.

But don't worry, Joe's bark is worse than his bite

I support this proiect , but i don't have need to know more answer , i am not the defender.

Hi Joe! Well ok, that's fine, just be aware a lot of people are here to obtain information and ask questions, with the hope of getting answers.

As a software developer, I -absolutely- care about the seriousness with which Pine approaches getting the modifications required into the Linux mainline. My HardKernel Odroid-c1 lays in the drawer because I can't get a new enough version of the Kernel to do what I need.

The vagueness and hostility towards how this question is being answered tells me that if I am serious - I need to find a vendor thst can both appreciate these questions and have solid answers for them. Competition in this space is only heating up.

RE: Collaboration from Allwinner - umiddelb - 03-08-2016

(03-08-2016, 09:14 AM)jaysonraymond Wrote: As a software developer, I -absolutely- care about the seriousness with which Pine approaches getting the modifications required into the Linux mainline. My HardKernel Odroid-c1 lays in the drawer because I can't get a new enough version of the Kernel to do what I need.

http://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=19292