![]() |
An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: Pinebook Pro (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +--- Forum: Linux on Pinebook Pro (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=114) +--- Thread: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro (/showthread.php?tid=8487) |
RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - rillian - 02-03-2020 Just wanted to note that firefox-esr 68.4.2-1esr has migrated from unstable to bullseye/testing, so you no longer need to add the unstable version to work around the 'illegal instruction' crash. The packaged Firefox works fine now. RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - xmixahlx - 02-03-2020 (02-03-2020, 05:20 PM)Jeremiah Cornelius Wrote:(02-03-2020, 01:55 PM)jpakkane Wrote: I have the same thing. Probably caused by a bug in the kernel and/or Mesa. I also got a message saying something like "unable to load firmware for rocksomething" in my old install using Gnome. I reinstalled xfce and that message is gone but starting X still does not work. these issues sound really annoying. I have zero issues with kernel 5.5, mesa-git, and sway-git... it actually works very well. is anyone else using this setup? RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - Jeremiah Cornelius - 02-04-2020 (02-03-2020, 11:14 PM)xmixahlx Wrote:A bunch of mesa/gl packages updated in Bullseye today, and everything is back to "normal".(02-03-2020, 05:20 PM)Jeremiah Cornelius Wrote:(02-03-2020, 01:55 PM)jpakkane Wrote: I have the same thing. Probably caused by a bug in the kernel and/or Mesa. I also got a message saying something like "unable to load firmware for rocksomething" in my old install using Gnome. I reinstalled xfce and that message is gone but starting X still does not work. This is my speediest, and otherwise most reliable installation with Gnome3, with the original @danielt installer. I'm sticking with it on nVME, and keeping a parallel test instance on SD, to test changes with u-boot/mesa/etc. RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - wasgurd - 02-04-2020 (02-04-2020, 03:22 PM)Jeremiah Cornelius Wrote: A bunch of mesa/gl packages updated in Bullseye today, and everything is back to "normal". There's a crash when you push Fn + F1, F2.... F12 RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - moonwalkers - 02-05-2020 (02-04-2020, 03:29 PM)wasgurd Wrote:(02-04-2020, 03:22 PM)Jeremiah Cornelius Wrote: A bunch of mesa/gl packages updated in Bullseye today, and everything is back to "normal". I'm on Sid with mesa from experimental, not seeing any crashes. Though for now OpenGL compositing in KWin is unusable, have to fall back to XRender. RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - Jeremiah Cornelius - 02-05-2020 (02-04-2020, 03:29 PM)wasgurd Wrote:(02-04-2020, 03:22 PM)Jeremiah Cornelius Wrote: A bunch of mesa/gl packages updated in Bullseye today, and everything is back to "normal". I can't repro this. (02-05-2020, 08:37 AM)moonwalkers Wrote:What's up with gparted?(02-04-2020, 03:29 PM)wasgurd Wrote:(02-04-2020, 03:22 PM)Jeremiah Cornelius Wrote: A bunch of mesa/gl packages updated in Bullseye today, and everything is back to "normal". It never renders right, eventually crashing the graphical session - X11 and Wayland. RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - jpakkane - 02-05-2020 I just ran an update, but no mesa packages got updated. Still broken in the same way. ![]() RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - Jeremiah Cornelius - 02-05-2020 (02-05-2020, 04:40 PM)jpakkane Wrote: I just ran an update, but no mesa packages got updated. Still broken in the same way. Hmnn. Buster or Bullseye? arm64 or armfh? My Buster Bullseye is doing well. RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - xmixahlx - 02-05-2020 gparted works for me. no graphical issues. no function key issues. RE: An unofficial Debian Installer for Pinebook Pro - danielt - 02-06-2020 I saw some of the comments about broken graphics. I haven't seen these before so I fired up a fresh install on an SD card and that worked just fine. However when I rebooted back into my daily driver and the display manager (gdm) wouldn't start. Once it had crashed enough times for systemd to give up restarting it I was able to get over to a console and run an apt upgrade. The package list didn't look very promising (well... a new libreoffice is nice but I didn't expect that to fix anything). However after a reboot all seems to be well again. Does the problem reproduce reliably. In other words does anyone think the upgrade has fixed it or do you think I spot it again in a couple of days time? |