Pine 64 benchmarks
#35
I thought I check the situation with common enclosures in the future. Usually enclosure makers don't think a second about thermal issues and then you end up with serious performance degradations. While the Phoronix Test Suite can't show the 'raw performance' of different systems due to many design flaws (most importantly when misused with modern SBCs due to ignoring thermal/throttling issues) at least the test suite can be used to demonstrate thermal behaviour.

Please have a look at the last two entries here: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/16031...603083GA70

This is absolutely the same hardware and the same OS image using the same kernel, U-Boot and so on.

The differences are compiler and throttling settings (software) and the last run was with the Pine64+ without heatsink jailed in a small cardboard box to emulate an enclosure. Compared with the run before (Pine64+ with less aggressive throttling settings, wearing a heatsink and a small 5V fan) it's obvious what's happening:

[Image: RPi-Monitor.png]

[Image: Pine64_in_Enclosure.png]

What can not be seen on the graphs is the count of available CPU cores. I disabled it since otherwise the graphs would've looked too weird. But when running the multithreaded tests the BSP kernel's throttling strategy quite often killed cpu3 and cpu2 and if longsleep would'nt have already included a 'core keeper' service in his Ubuntu image I would've ended up with a dual core system pretty soon after starting the tests. Longsleep's service checks the cooler state and brings back killed cores when it's below a certain treshold:

Code:
root@pine64plus:/etc/rpimonitor# /usr/local/bin/armbianmonitor -m
Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c]
Time        CPU    load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq   CPU
09:54:30: 1008MHz  4.76  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   90°C 4 cores active
09:54:35:  816MHz  4.70  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   90°C 4 cores active
09:54:40: 1008MHz  4.73  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   95°C 2 cores active
09:54:46: 1008MHz  4.75  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   93°C 4 cores active
09:54:51: 1008MHz  4.69  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   88°C 4 cores active
09:54:56:  600MHz  4.63  83%   1%  80%   0%   1%   0%   95°C 2 cores active
09:55:01: 1008MHz  4.82  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   92°C 4 cores active
09:55:07:  816MHz  4.76  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   88°C 4 cores active
09:55:12:  600MHz  4.78  91%   1%  88%   0%   1%   0%   93°C 4 cores active


Messages In This Thread
Pine 64 benchmarks - by patrickhwood - 03-02-2016, 12:11 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by nomadewolf - 03-05-2016, 02:04 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by patrickhwood - 03-05-2016, 03:10 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-06-2016, 11:16 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tllim - 03-06-2016, 11:30 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by patrickhwood - 03-06-2016, 11:54 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-06-2016, 12:05 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-06-2016, 01:41 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by longsleep - 03-06-2016, 03:06 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-06-2016, 08:04 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-07-2016, 11:30 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by longsleep - 03-07-2016, 12:49 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-07-2016, 07:54 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by longsleep - 03-07-2016, 12:43 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-07-2016, 12:59 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-07-2016, 01:34 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by longsleep - 03-07-2016, 01:40 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-07-2016, 02:03 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-08-2016, 12:07 AM
Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-08-2016, 12:34 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by longsleep - 03-08-2016, 01:09 AM
Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-08-2016, 04:04 AM
Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-08-2016, 06:39 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-08-2016, 06:59 AM
Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-08-2016, 07:10 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-08-2016, 09:42 AM
Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-08-2016, 10:14 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-08-2016, 10:34 AM
Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-08-2016, 11:16 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by longsleep - 03-08-2016, 12:31 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Artyom - 03-09-2016, 02:03 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-09-2016, 03:53 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by ssvb - 03-09-2016, 11:30 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-09-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-10-2016, 04:45 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-10-2016, 10:03 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-10-2016, 01:42 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-11-2016, 05:03 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by norm24 - 03-11-2016, 05:39 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-11-2016, 09:59 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by xtcrefugee - 03-11-2016, 11:35 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-11-2016, 01:03 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tllim - 03-11-2016, 04:56 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-12-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-11-2016, 11:55 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Artyom - 03-12-2016, 03:06 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by g_t_j - 03-15-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tllim - 03-15-2016, 04:19 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by g_t_j - 03-15-2016, 04:43 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-15-2016, 08:41 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by g_t_j - 03-16-2016, 06:11 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by janjwerner - 03-15-2016, 04:46 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by g_t_j - 03-15-2016, 05:00 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tllim - 03-15-2016, 07:52 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-16-2016, 01:56 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by g_t_j - 05-28-2016, 11:23 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tllim - 05-28-2016, 07:31 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by g_t_j - 05-29-2016, 01:23 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tllim - 05-29-2016, 09:18 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by norm24 - 03-15-2016, 11:26 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-16-2016, 04:38 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by Andrew2 - 03-16-2016, 06:04 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by BarBrian - 03-28-2016, 11:22 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by stealthbanana - 04-07-2016, 10:40 AM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by TeaPack - 04-15-2016, 01:17 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tkaiser - 04-15-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by TeaPack - 04-15-2016, 02:32 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by tkaiser - 04-15-2016, 02:45 PM
RE: Pine 64 benchmarks - by TeaPack - 04-15-2016, 03:00 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Pine A64+ mainline mipi-dsi Learnincurve 3 4,929 01-12-2021, 07:36 AM
Last Post: Learnincurve
  DietPi OS for PINE A64 MichaIng 0 5,736 12-15-2020, 06:11 AM
Last Post: MichaIng
  Fedora 32/CentOS 8 Pine A64+ Images wideawake 2 4,103 10-02-2020, 11:38 AM
Last Post: mathiraj
  LibreELEC(KODI) for Pine A64 (+) pineadmin 6 12,672 05-02-2020, 10:29 AM
Last Post: aaronmarsh632
  Lakka-nightlies for Pine A64 (and H64) roel 11 14,656 04-23-2020, 12:55 AM
Last Post: roel
  Read DHT22 on Pine A64 ayufan 3 4,956 01-19-2020, 02:51 PM
Last Post: {-DesT-}
  Centos 7 for Pine A64 Luke 2 4,808 05-28-2019, 12:18 AM
Last Post: pineadmin
  NEMS Linux for Pine A64 (+) Luke 1 4,071 05-09-2019, 05:42 PM
Last Post: pineadmin
  Pine Board using linux stuck during boot sequence ktaragorn 4 6,276 03-30-2019, 06:48 AM
Last Post: ktaragorn
  motionEyeOS (PINE A64(+)) pineadmin 4 10,154 11-09-2018, 03:25 AM
Last Post: pineadmin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)