Google Brillo IoT OS compatibility
#1
What is the probability that Pine 64 will satisfy Google's Brillo IoT hardware compatibility?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Brillo

Google is developing Brillo as the IoT OS and ecosystem to do home automation, smart cities, and everything IoT.  

At the moment, Google has approved the Brillo compatibility of Intel Edison or Qualcomm Dragonboard 410c development board.
https://developers.google.com/brillo/?hl=en

Android based Brillo arives-with-hacker-sbc-support
http://linuxgizmos.com/android-based-bri...c-support/

"Brillo can be configured to run within resources as small as 128MB of flash and 32MB of RAM"
Brillo supports "ARM, Intel, and MIPS hacker SBCs."

It would appear that Pine 64 should be compatible with Brillo, but I'm not sure if there is any other considerations I'm missing.
  Reply
#2
(01-14-2016, 08:28 PM)AnonSequitur Wrote: What is the probability that Pine 64 will satisfy Google's Brillo IoT hardware compatibility?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Brillo

Google is developing Brillo as the IoT OS and ecosystem to do home automation, smart cities, and everything IoT.  

At the moment, Google has approved the Brillo compatibility of Intel Edison or Qualcomm Dragonboard 410c development board.
https://developers.google.com/brillo/?hl=en

Android based Brillo arives-with-hacker-sbc-support
http://linuxgizmos.com/android-based-bri...c-support/

"Brillo can be configured to run within resources as small as 128MB of flash and 32MB of RAM"
Brillo supports "ARM, Intel, and MIPS hacker SBCs."

It would appear that Pine 64 should be compatible with Brillo, but I'm not sure if there is any other considerations I'm missing.
Looks like Brillo able to run on Pine A64 board if there is developer interest to work on this porting.
  Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  AIY - Google Home jauyzed 3 3,868 11-05-2017, 01:16 AM
Last Post: dkryder

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)