pinephone 2 specs discussion - 5G WiFi6 BT5 NFC? -
(04-01-2021, 02:19 PM)misha64 Wrote: True

But not much can be expected from Allwinner A64. It is from 2015 with 40 nm architecture. No wonder poor power efficiency and performance. This is 6! years old hardware not even designed for mobile use, you most probably do not use laptop from that time anymore.

I am writing this on a laptop that was manufactured in 2004. It has a 32-bit "Core Duo" T2300 CPU. Originally designed for Windows XP, I upgraded it to 2GB DDR2 memory (its maximum) and installed an old 30GB SSD I had handy. (The laptop has SATA 1.0.)

I use this old laptop practically ever day. It's now running Linux with LXDE desktop and has no problems with general web browsing and even videos. (Not the fastest thing in the world obviously but it's really not bad.) So the idea of the Pinephone using 6-year-old tech doesn't seem especially worrisome to me, particularly given the price.
I'd like a PinePhone with 8GB of RAM, a much faster CPU (Quartz64 might be a great start). I would also like is support for 5 GHz Wi-Fi, 2.4 is pretty outdated as most phones (even budget ones) supports 5GHz Wi-Fi right out of the box.

The PinePhone display is still pretty fragile despite tempered glass claim, so perhaps we should use better tempered glass next time?
Find me in the forest, when I'm at my lowest. I don't really think you should continue..

(03-26-2021, 11:03 AM)neil_swann80 Wrote: I'd quite like an IR transceiver.  Working in AV it's nice to have a device that you can use as a one-for-all remote.
In the meantime have you looked into building a web-based IR transmitter? It's a fun little project and one you can find multiple guides for on the web, using an ESP8266 or Raspberry Pi. Here are a couple of links to inspire:

And reach out if you have any questions!
(04-01-2021, 02:19 PM)misha64 Wrote:
(03-27-2021, 08:02 AM)bitsandnumbers Wrote: We cannot make assumptions for the best optimized hardware unless software is optimized itself.

I believe the wise thing to do before getting into these new hardware considerations is to wait and see what software can actually deliver with the current hardware. Then it will be easy to evaluate what kind of specs/price would be best for a new PP iteration.


But not much can be expected from Allwinner A64. It is from 2015 with 40 nm architecture. No wonder poor power efficiency and performance. This is 6! years old hardware not even designed for mobile use, you most probably do not use laptop from that time anymore.

All the more, you can't deny that when software will be optimized for the Allwinner A64, we will have *rock solid* base for an informed decision on hardware choice.

Plus, old hardware mean almost nothing. I insist on "almost", because at some point it matters. But recent hardware is really really really under-exploited in 90% of cases, and it tends to make developers lazy with sub-optimized softwares, hence most of the slowdown we see on old hardware.

The Pinephone can actually deliver enough for most of people use once we get the good hardware/software recipes. Even the RAM limitation should not be one before a few years.

Just so you know, before buying my Pinephone Mobian Edition (that I use as a daily driver), I was using an iPhone 5c (Apple A6 32 nm, dual core with 3-core PowerVR chip) that I bought some 8 years ago. Guess what : it still worked really well and snappy. Only limitiation (that even was not so limiting) was 1Gb of RAM and no more iOS updates. I had to let it go because of a dead battery.

So I really don't think that the Allwinner A64 is so limiting that we should begin thinking beyond right now : I truly believe in optimized software that get the most out of what we already got.

The only really limiting hardware I see here on the Pinephone is the eMMC speed which is hard to overcome with software.

One last thing : the Pinephone has been made for tinkerers by an hardware hacking company that make hardware for hackers and developers (by hackers I mean "modifiers", not pirates). So a new iteration of the Pinephone will be for this category of customers that want opensource, hackable, self-repairable phones : this comes with tradeoffs because phone industry is mainly focused on closed-source chips and finding opensource hardware is a *really* hard job, let alone for smartphone production. Tradeoffs mean lower specs and older chips because manufacturers are very touchy when it comes to opensourcing new technologies. The only way I can see a well-spec'd fully opensource phone happening is if some manufacturer finally enter the breach and begin to sell a new range of modern, recent opensource chips for phones. I say why not, but it still doesn't exist.

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Poll 2: What is your favorite distro/interface for the PinePhone? amosbatto 2 743 09-26-2021, 08:56 AM
Last Post: AwHereWeGoAgain
  my broken pinephone, possible sale zetabeta 1 103 09-23-2021, 06:54 AM
Last Post: kqlnut
  Austrialians now have a better reason to use PinePhone KNERD 19 777 09-22-2021, 01:05 PM
Last Post: tophneal
  Sim cards and carriers, discussion bcnaz 107 29,737 09-22-2021, 08:12 AM
Last Post: Zebulon Walton
  Add kill switches to the PinePhone 10 1,023 09-18-2021, 12:59 PM
Last Post: biketool
  Manjaro Edition Pinephone for sale mstevens 5 169 09-17-2021, 10:50 AM
Last Post: mstevens
  Are you using the Pinephone as your daily driver? jro 91 14,468 09-17-2021, 07:26 AM
Last Post: user641
  PinePhone is not a daily driver FOSSagent0 17 1,562 09-17-2021, 01:11 AM
Last Post: bogen85
  Pinephone app development drgr33n 23 2,967 09-16-2021, 02:16 PM
Last Post: ragreenburg
  New PinePhone user dachalife 4 302 09-15-2021, 12:01 PM
Last Post: dachalife

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)