Can you say the rockpro64 is nothing more than a rock64 computer, the rockpro64 having two more
processors?
Is it possible to quantify in percents how much faster the rockpro64 is?
Thank you.
(08-15-2018, 02:06 PM)heocb Wrote: [ -> ]Can you say the rockpro64 is nothing more than a rock64 computer, the rockpro64 having two more
processors?
Is it possible to quantify in percents how much faster the rockpro64 is?
Thank you.
I have a ffmpeg test I ran on both the rp64 and r64, the r64 takes just over 15 minutes to complete, and it takes about 5 minutes on the rp64.
(08-15-2018, 04:39 PM)evilbunny Wrote: [ -> ] (08-15-2018, 02:06 PM)heocb Wrote: [ -> ]Can you say the rockpro64 is nothing more than a rock64 computer, the rockpro64 having two more
processors?
Is it possible to quantify in percents how much faster the rockpro64 is?
Thank you.
I have a ffmpeg test I ran on both the rp64 and r64, the r64 takes just over 15 minutes to complete, and it takes about 5 minutes on the rp64.
The differences between the RK3328 and the RK3399 is enough to make the jump from the Rock64 to the RockPro64, even if I never manage to make use of the PCIe slot.
Check side by side
Rock64 (RK3328) and
RockPro64 (RK3399) and search the internet for reviews/benchmarks.
Advances of RK3399:
- ~2x faster Cortex-A72 (architecture bigLITTLE for performance and power optimization, 3-way superscalar, 2x-4x more cache)
- ~2x throughput of memory (64-bit)
- ~2x-5x faster and newer GPU (Mali-T864 (wiki), OpenGL ES1.1/2.0/3.0/3.1, OpenCL, DX11, Vulkan...)
- more peripherals (PCIex, more video outputs, camera inputs and other peripherals ...)
(08-22-2018, 04:36 AM)mcerveny Wrote: [ -> ]- ~2x faster Cortex-A72 (architecture bigLITTLE for performance and power optimization, 3-way superscalar, 2x-4x more cache)
<snip>
You can add LPDDR4 for the rp64 and LPDDR3 for r64