(01-10-2016, 03:32 PM)nomadewolf Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2016, 12:27 PM)Andrew2 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2016, 10:58 AM)nomadewolf Wrote: [ -> ]Not that it is their obligation or anything, but it seems they want to give us some sort of hope.
Who are you referring to?
I'm referring to Allwinner, based on tllim's responses.
Is Allwinner trying to convince the Pine64 backers the Pine64 gets good Linux support? Or is this another party? Interestingly ttlim refrains from answering these questions:
http://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?t...640#pid640
(01-10-2016, 03:50 PM)Andrew2 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2016, 03:32 PM)nomadewolf Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2016, 12:27 PM)Andrew2 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2016, 10:58 AM)nomadewolf Wrote: [ -> ]Not that it is their obligation or anything, but it seems they want to give us some sort of hope.
Who are you referring to?
I'm referring to Allwinner, based on tllim's responses.
Is Allwinner trying to convince the Pine64 backers the Pine64 gets good Linux support? Or is this another party? Interestingly ttlim refrains from answering these questions: http://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?t...640#pid640
Lets not guess into wrong way. There is no convincing act from Allwinner to get Pine64 backer. Yes, I indeed refrains myself to answer some questions that not in my position and capacity to answer. I just try to make Pine64 a success platform like Raspberry Pi, and I am not in "witness" stand.