PINE64
4.4.120-gac51b70a-dirty works, 4.4.126-g6dc34509-dirty seems broken - Printable Version

+- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org)
+-- Forum: ROCK64 (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=85)
+--- Forum: Linux on Rock64 (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=88)
+--- Thread: 4.4.120-gac51b70a-dirty works, 4.4.126-g6dc34509-dirty seems broken (/showthread.php?tid=6038)



4.4.120-gac51b70a-dirty works, 4.4.126-g6dc34509-dirty seems broken - cooker - 05-07-2018

I dare not do apt update/upgrade on my rock64-NAS, my family is using it.  So, I intend to build an update with AppArmor enabled on my spare rock64 and swap the sdcard after test.

Today, I follow exactly the same steps as what I had done successfully before.  But failed.

Sorry I am not a developer, I don't even have an active git a/c, I am happy to follow if you have a comprehensive instruction know-how on how to report error.  However, obviously, you don't have time to prepare that.  I can only report it here.

Running the first make -j5 (after make menuconfig) looks fine.  --edit-- sorry, it gets error too.
Then, there are lot of errors (missing files) during sudo make modules_install
Followings are copied from the end of sudo make install
I did it twice.  It should easily be reproduced.

Code:
make[3]: *** [drivers/gpu/arm/built-in.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:484: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/arm' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/gpu/arm] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:484: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  CC      drivers/hid/hid-debug.o
  CC      drivers/hid/hidraw.o
...
...
  LD      drivers/hid/usbhid/built-in.o
  LD      drivers/hid/built-in.o
Makefile:1028: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Thank you for your attention.

edit --------------------

BTW, I always use
Code:
$ git clone --depth 1 --single-branch -b release-4.4 https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/linux-kernel
to get the source code and assume it is the stable release.  Is it?


edit 2 ---------------
Lucky me saved a copy of source code for 4.4.120
Just do the "make -j5" again, I timed it and it took real 80m.
I amended the first post that said the step of "make -j5" is fine because that took real 40m only.  Something should be wrong for such a big time saving, right?
Good Night