RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - Printable Version +- PINE64 (https://forum.pine64.org) +-- Forum: General (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: News (https://forum.pine64.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=5624) |
RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - Tigger - 04-30-2018 (04-29-2018, 03:40 PM)tllim Wrote: If using on-board antenna and place in middle on the main board, the performance can be suck. Having U.FL connectors allows user to explore their option. I'm going to enjoy this soon. RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - pfeerick - 04-30-2018 (04-30-2018, 01:07 AM)Tigger Wrote: I'm going to enjoy this soon. Indeed... considering the beefier CPU and heatsink, as well as all the other improved specs, here's hoping this gives some real bang for your buck at this price point... it would be nice to show up some of the other SBC boards well and truly performance vs cost wise! RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - Tigger - 04-30-2018 (04-30-2018, 02:56 AM)pfeerick Wrote: Indeed... considering the beefier CPU and heatsink, as well as all the other improved specs, here's hoping this gives some real bang for your buck at this price point... it would be nice to show up some of the other SBC boards well and truly performance vs cost wise! Agreed. This board will be the best bang for buck at this price point. That's why I'm getting two (if I'm on time). RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - angelscream09 - 04-30-2018 (04-30-2018, 02:56 AM)pfeerick Wrote:I just wish the new RockPro64 had an add on DAC in the works.(04-30-2018, 01:07 AM)Tigger Wrote: I'm going to enjoy this soon. Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - tllim - 05-01-2018 (04-30-2018, 11:43 AM)angelscream09 Wrote:For Media playback, please use ROCK64 board. ROCKPro64 suitable for high CPU and GPU computation power appliaction, the VPU performance is about the same as ROCK64. Due to this reason, we don't create a ROCKPro64 DAC board.(04-30-2018, 02:56 AM)pfeerick Wrote:I just wish the new RockPro64 had an add on DAC in the works.(04-30-2018, 01:07 AM)Tigger Wrote: I'm going to enjoy this soon. RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - Tigger - 05-06-2018 On the RockPro64 Acrylic Open Enclosure page in the shop, there is this note : "Note: This case only fits ROCKPro64 board without PCIe interface card slot in.". Is it safe to assume that the RockPrto64 Heatsink does fit this acrylic case ? And just pushing my luck from here : If the heatsink does not fit the case, could the top piece be marked with an almost invisible hairline square where the heatsink would have to go through (so that I/we could Dremel it) ? Or better still a press-out square (although this might upset owners of other Pine boards). RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - xtract - 05-08-2018 Any updates on shipping date? I was expecting to have delivered to Spain before June, but if you do not ship Rockpro64 soon then that means I could have waited for the production batch... RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - tllim - 05-10-2018 (05-08-2018, 12:35 PM)xtract Wrote: Any updates on shipping date? I was expecting to have delivered to Spain before June, but if you do not ship Rockpro64 soon then that means I could have waited for the production batch... The first ROCKPro64 batch shipped out on May 11. RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - Tigger - 06-13-2018 (04-30-2018, 01:07 AM)Tigger Wrote:(04-29-2018, 03:40 PM)tllim Wrote: If using on-board antenna and place in middle on the main board, the performance can be suck. Having U.FL connectors allows user to explore their option. Does anyone know if specs/recommendations for the BT/WiFi module U.FL antennas are included with the module ? I'm looking for recommended antenna gain (DBi), and impedance (Ohm). I can't find anything about this on the RockPro64 Wiki page. RE: RockPro64 and Pine H64 Discussion Thread - Luke - 06-13-2018 (06-13-2018, 05:57 AM)Tigger Wrote:(04-30-2018, 01:07 AM)Tigger Wrote:(04-29-2018, 03:40 PM)tllim Wrote: If using on-board antenna and place in middle on the main board, the performance can be suck. Having U.FL connectors allows user to explore their option. Indeed, good you pointed out that there is no info about the antennas. The antennas that come with it are rather basic (see picture). If you want something with higher gain then you'd have to get another pair. |